Theorem oa3-2wto2 989

Description: Derivation of 3-OA variant from weaker version. (Contributed by NM, 25-Dec-1998.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
oa3-2wto2.1	(a⊥ ∩ (a ∪ (b ∩ ((a ∩ b) ∪ ((a →1 c) ∩ (b →1 c)))))) ≤ c

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oa3-2wto2	((a →1 c) ∩ (a ∪ (b ∩ ((a ∩ b) ∪ ((a →1 c) ∩ (b →1 c)))))) ≤ c

Proof of Theorem oa3-2wto2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oa3-2wto2.1	. 2 (a⊥ ∩ (a ∪ (b ∩ ((a ∩ b) ∪ ((a →1 c) ∩ (b →1 c)))))) ≤ c
2	1	oas 925	1 ((a →1 c) ∩ (a ∪ (b ∩ ((a ∩ b) ∪ ((a →1 c) ∩ (b →1 c)))))) ≤ c

Syntax hints:   ≤ wle 2  ^⊥ wn 4   ∪ wo 6   ∩ wa 7   →₁ wi1 12

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-a1 30  ax-a2 31  ax-a3 32  ax-a4 33  ax-a5 34  ax-r1 35  ax-r2 36  ax-r4 37  ax-r5 38  ax-r3 439

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-b 39  df-a 40  df-t 41  df-f 42  df-i1 44  df-le1 130  df-le2 131  df-c1 132  df-c2 133

This theorem is referenced by: (None)