Quantum Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > QLE Home > Th. List > u2lem2 | GIF version |
Description: Lemma for unified implication study. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-1997.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
u2lem2 | (((a →2 b) →2 a) →2 a) = 1 |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-i2 45 | . 2 (((a →2 b) →2 a) →2 a) = (a ∪ (((a →2 b) →2 a)⊥ ∩ a⊥ )) | |
2 | u2lem1n 740 | . . . . . 6 ((a →2 b) →2 a)⊥ = a⊥ | |
3 | 2 | ran 78 | . . . . 5 (((a →2 b) →2 a)⊥ ∩ a⊥ ) = (a⊥ ∩ a⊥ ) |
4 | anidm 111 | . . . . 5 (a⊥ ∩ a⊥ ) = a⊥ | |
5 | 3, 4 | ax-r2 36 | . . . 4 (((a →2 b) →2 a)⊥ ∩ a⊥ ) = a⊥ |
6 | 5 | lor 70 | . . 3 (a ∪ (((a →2 b) →2 a)⊥ ∩ a⊥ )) = (a ∪ a⊥ ) |
7 | df-t 41 | . . . 4 1 = (a ∪ a⊥ ) | |
8 | 7 | ax-r1 35 | . . 3 (a ∪ a⊥ ) = 1 |
9 | 6, 8 | ax-r2 36 | . 2 (a ∪ (((a →2 b) →2 a)⊥ ∩ a⊥ )) = 1 |
10 | 1, 9 | ax-r2 36 | 1 (((a →2 b) →2 a) →2 a) = 1 |
Colors of variables: term |
Syntax hints: = wb 1 ⊥ wn 4 ∪ wo 6 ∩ wa 7 1wt 8 →2 wi2 13 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-a1 30 ax-a2 31 ax-a3 32 ax-a5 34 ax-r1 35 ax-r2 36 ax-r4 37 ax-r5 38 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-a 40 df-t 41 df-f 42 df-i2 45 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |