ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  brab2ga Unicode version

Theorem brab2ga 4435
Description: The law of concretion for a binary relation. See brab2a 4413 for alternate proof. TODO: should one of them be deleted? (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
brab2ga.1  |-  ( ( x  =  A  /\  y  =  B )  ->  ( ph  <->  ps )
)
brab2ga.2  |-  R  =  { <. x ,  y
>.  |  ( (
x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  ph ) }
Assertion
Ref Expression
brab2ga  |-  ( A R B  <->  ( ( A  e.  C  /\  B  e.  D )  /\  ps ) )
Distinct variable groups:    x, y, A   
x, B, y    x, C, y    x, D, y    ps, x, y
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y)    R( x, y)

Proof of Theorem brab2ga
StepHypRef Expression
1 brab2ga.2 . . . 4  |-  R  =  { <. x ,  y
>.  |  ( (
x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  /\  ph ) }
2 opabssxp 4434 . . . 4  |-  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D
)  /\  ph ) } 
C_  ( C  X.  D )
31, 2eqsstri 3030 . . 3  |-  R  C_  ( C  X.  D
)
43brel 4412 . 2  |-  ( A R B  ->  ( A  e.  C  /\  B  e.  D )
)
5 df-br 3788 . . . 4  |-  ( A R B  <->  <. A ,  B >.  e.  R )
61eleq2i 2146 . . . 4  |-  ( <. A ,  B >.  e.  R  <->  <. A ,  B >.  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D
)  /\  ph ) } )
75, 6bitri 182 . . 3  |-  ( A R B  <->  <. A ,  B >.  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D
)  /\  ph ) } )
8 brab2ga.1 . . . 4  |-  ( ( x  =  A  /\  y  =  B )  ->  ( ph  <->  ps )
)
98opelopab2a 4022 . . 3  |-  ( ( A  e.  C  /\  B  e.  D )  ->  ( <. A ,  B >.  e.  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( ( x  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D
)  /\  ph ) }  <->  ps ) )
107, 9syl5bb 190 . 2  |-  ( ( A  e.  C  /\  B  e.  D )  ->  ( A R B  <->  ps ) )
114, 10biadan2 444 1  |-  ( A R B  <->  ( ( A  e.  C  /\  B  e.  D )  /\  ps ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 102    <-> wb 103    = wceq 1285    e. wcel 1434   <.cop 3403   class class class wbr 3787   {copab 3840    X. cxp 4363
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-14 1446  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2064  ax-sep 3898  ax-pow 3950  ax-pr 3966
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 922  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687  df-eu 1945  df-mo 1946  df-clab 2069  df-cleq 2075  df-clel 2078  df-nfc 2209  df-ral 2354  df-rex 2355  df-v 2604  df-un 2978  df-in 2980  df-ss 2987  df-pw 3386  df-sn 3406  df-pr 3407  df-op 3409  df-br 3788  df-opab 3842  df-xp 4371
This theorem is referenced by:  reapval  7732  ltxr  8916
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator