Theorem flimval 22571

Description: The set of limit points of a filter. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 4-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Aug-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
flimval.1	⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽

Assertion

Ref	Expression
flimval	⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil) → (𝐽 fLim 𝐹) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐹   𝑥,𝐽   𝑥,𝑋

Proof of Theorem flimval

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑗 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		flimval.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽
2	1	topopn 21514	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)
3	2	adantr 483	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)
4		rabexg 5234	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐽 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)} ∈ V)
5	3, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)} ∈ V)
6		simpl 485	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → 𝑗 = 𝐽)
7	6	unieqd 4852	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → ∪ 𝑗 = ∪ 𝐽)
8	7, 1	syl6eqr 2874	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → ∪ 𝑗 = 𝑋)
9	6	fveq2d 6674	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → (nei‘𝑗) = (nei‘𝐽))
10	9	fveq1d 6672	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → ((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) = ((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}))
11		simpr 487	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → 𝑓 = 𝐹)
12	10, 11	sseq12d 4000	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → (((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑓 ↔ ((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹))
13	8	pweqd 4558	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 = 𝒫 𝑋)
14	11, 13	sseq12d 4000	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → (𝑓 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ↔ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋))
15	12, 14	anbi12d 632	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → ((((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗) ↔ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)))
16	8, 15	rabeqbidv 3485	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑗 = 𝐽 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐹) → {𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑗 ∣ (((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)})
17		df-flim 22547	. . 3 ⊢ fLim = (𝑗 ∈ Top, 𝑓 ∈ ∪ ran Fil ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑗 ∣ (((nei‘𝑗)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗)})
18	16, 17	ovmpoga 7304	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil ∧ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)} ∈ V) → (𝐽 fLim 𝐹) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)})
19	5, 18	mpd3an3 1458	1 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ∪ ran Fil) → (𝐽 fLim 𝐹) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (((nei‘𝐽)‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  {crab 3142  Vcvv 3494   ⊆ wss 3936  𝒫 cpw 4539  {csn 4567  ∪ cuni 4838  ran crn 5556  ‘cfv 6355  (class class class)co 7156  Topctop 21501  neicnei 21705  Filcfil 22453   fLim cflim 22542

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5203  ax-nul 5210  ax-pr 5330

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3773  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-pw 4541  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4839  df-br 5067  df-opab 5129  df-id 5460  df-xp 5561  df-rel 5562  df-cnv 5563  df-co 5564  df-dm 5565  df-iota 6314  df-fun 6357  df-fv 6363  df-ov 7159  df-oprab 7160  df-mpo 7161  df-top 21502  df-flim 22547

This theorem is referenced by:  elflim2  22572