Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > fvimacnvALT | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Alternate proof of fvimacnv 6823, based on funimass3 6824. If funimass3 6824 is ever proved directly, as opposed to using funimacnv 6435 pointwise, then the proof of funimacnv 6435 should be replaced with this one. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 20-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
fvimacnvALT | ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | snssi 4741 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → {𝐴} ⊆ dom 𝐹) | |
2 | funimass3 6824 | . . 3 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ {𝐴} ⊆ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) | |
3 | 1, 2 | sylan2 594 | . 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) |
4 | fvex 6683 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ V | |
5 | 4 | snss 4718 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {(𝐹‘𝐴)} ⊆ 𝐵) |
6 | eqid 2821 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ dom 𝐹 = dom 𝐹 | |
7 | df-fn 6358 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 ↔ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ dom 𝐹 = dom 𝐹)) | |
8 | 7 | biimpri 230 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ dom 𝐹 = dom 𝐹) → 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹) |
9 | 6, 8 | mpan2 689 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹) |
10 | fnsnfv 6743 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → {(𝐹‘𝐴)} = (𝐹 “ {𝐴})) | |
11 | 9, 10 | sylan 582 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → {(𝐹‘𝐴)} = (𝐹 “ {𝐴})) |
12 | 11 | sseq1d 3998 | . . 3 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ({(𝐹‘𝐴)} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ⊆ 𝐵)) |
13 | 5, 12 | syl5bb 285 | . 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ⊆ 𝐵)) |
14 | snssg 4717 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵) ↔ {𝐴} ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) | |
15 | 14 | adantl 484 | . 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵) ↔ {𝐴} ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) |
16 | 3, 13, 15 | 3bitr4d 313 | 1 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 398 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2114 ⊆ wss 3936 {csn 4567 ◡ccnv 5554 dom cdm 5555 “ cima 5558 Fun wfun 6349 Fn wfn 6350 ‘cfv 6355 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2145 ax-11 2161 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2793 ax-sep 5203 ax-nul 5210 ax-pr 5330 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-3an 1085 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2622 df-eu 2654 df-clab 2800 df-cleq 2814 df-clel 2893 df-nfc 2963 df-ne 3017 df-ral 3143 df-rex 3144 df-rab 3147 df-v 3496 df-sbc 3773 df-dif 3939 df-un 3941 df-in 3943 df-ss 3952 df-nul 4292 df-if 4468 df-sn 4568 df-pr 4570 df-op 4574 df-uni 4839 df-br 5067 df-opab 5129 df-id 5460 df-xp 5561 df-rel 5562 df-cnv 5563 df-co 5564 df-dm 5565 df-rn 5566 df-res 5567 df-ima 5568 df-iota 6314 df-fun 6357 df-fn 6358 df-fv 6363 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |