Theorem ssin0 39537

Description: If two classes are disjoint, two respective subclasses are disjoint. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssin0	⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅)

Proof of Theorem ssin0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ss2in 3873	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
2	1	3adant1 1099	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
3		eqimss 3690	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ ∅)
4	3	3ad2ant1 1102	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ ∅)
5	2, 4	sstrd 3646	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ ∅)
6		ss0 4007	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ ∅ → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅)
7	5, 6	syl 17	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1054   = wceq 1523   ∩ cin 3606   ⊆ wss 3607  ∅c0 3948

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1762  ax-4 1777  ax-5 1879  ax-6 1945  ax-7 1981  ax-9 2039  ax-10 2059  ax-11 2074  ax-12 2087  ax-13 2282  ax-ext 2631

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1056  df-tru 1526  df-ex 1745  df-nf 1750  df-sb 1938  df-clab 2638  df-cleq 2644  df-clel 2647  df-nfc 2782  df-v 3233  df-dif 3610  df-in 3614  df-ss 3621  df-nul 3949

This theorem is referenced by:  sge0resplit  40941