Theorem ssin0 41398

Description: If two classes are disjoint, two respective subclasses are disjoint. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssin0	⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅)

Proof of Theorem ssin0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ss2in 4206	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
2	1	3adant1 1125	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
3		eqimss 4016	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ ∅)
4	3	3ad2ant1 1128	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ ∅)
5	2, 4	sstrd 3970	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ ∅)
6		ss0 4345	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ ∅ → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅)
7	5, 6	syl 17	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1082   = wceq 1536   ∩ cin 3928   ⊆ wss 3929  ∅c0 4284

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2792

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1084  df-tru 1539  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2799  df-cleq 2813  df-clel 2892  df-nfc 2962  df-rab 3146  df-v 3493  df-dif 3932  df-in 3936  df-ss 3945  df-nul 4285

This theorem is referenced by:  sge0resplit  42769