| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > 3jaao | GIF version | ||
| Description: Inference conjoining and disjoining the antecedents of three implications. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3jaao.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
| 3jaao.2 | ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜒)) |
| 3jaao.3 | ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝜁 → 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3jaao | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜁) → 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3jaao.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | 1 | 3ad2ant1 1020 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
| 3 | 3jaao.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜒)) | |
| 4 | 3 | 3ad2ant2 1021 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜏 → 𝜒)) |
| 5 | 3jaao.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝜁 → 𝜒)) | |
| 6 | 5 | 3ad2ant3 1022 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜁 → 𝜒)) |
| 7 | 2, 4, 6 | 3jaod 1315 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜁) → 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∨ w3o 979 ∧ w3a 980 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3or 981 df-3an 982 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |