Theorem 3jaod 1316

Description: Disjunction of 3 antecedents (deduction). (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
3jaod.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3jaod.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))
3jaod.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3jaod	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜏) → 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem 3jaod

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3jaod.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
2		3jaod.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))
3		3jaod.3	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜒))
4		3jao 1313	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜏 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜏) → 𝜒))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	syl3anc 1249	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜏) → 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ w3o 979

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 981  df-3an 982

This theorem is referenced by:  3jaodan  1318  3jaao  1320  issod  4365  nnawordex  6614  exmidontri2or  7354  addlocprlem  7647  nqprloc  7657  ltexprlemrl  7722  aptiprleml  7751  aptiprlemu  7752  elnn0z  9384  zaddcl  9411  zletric  9415  zlelttric  9416  zltnle  9417  zdceq  9447  zdcle  9448  zdclt  9449  nn01to3  9737  xposdif  10003  fzdcel  10161  qletric  10382  qlelttric  10383  qltnle  10384  qdceq  10385  qdclt  10386  frec2uzlt2d  10547  perfectlem2  15443  triap  15930  tridceq  15957