| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer | 
      
      
      < Previous  
      Next >
      
       Nearby theorems  | 
  ||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > impbidd | GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduce an equivalence from two implications. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 12-Oct-2010.) | 
| Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|
| impbidd.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | 
| impbidd.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) | 
| Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|
| impbidd | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))) | 
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | impbidd.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | |
| 2 | impbidd.2 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) | |
| 3 | bi3 119 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → ((𝜃 → 𝜒) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))) | |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | syl6c 66 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))) | 
| Colors of variables: wff set class | 
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 | 
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 | 
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 | 
| This theorem is referenced by: impbid21d 128 pm5.74 179 con1biimdc 874 pclem6 1385 | 
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |