Theorem adh-minim-ax1 48169

Description: Derivation of ax-1 6 from adh-minim 48164 and ax-mp 5. Carew Arthur Meredith derived ax-1 6 in A single axiom of positive logic, The Journal of Computing Systems, volume 1, issue 3, July 1953, pages 169--170. However, here we follow the shortened derivation by Ivo Thomas, On Meredith's sole positive axiom, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, volume XV, number 3, July 1974, page 477. Polish prefix notation: CpCqp . (Contributed by ADH, 10-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
adh-minim-ax1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))

Proof of Theorem adh-minim-ax1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		adh-minim-ax1-ax2-lem1 48165	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑)) → (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
2		adh-minim-ax1-ax2-lem1 48165	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → ((𝜓 → ((𝜂 → ((𝜁 → (𝜓 → 𝜎)) → (𝜁 → 𝜎))) → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑))) → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑))))
3		adh-minim-ax1-ax2-lem3 48167	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → (𝜓 → 𝜑)) → (𝜓 → ((𝜂 → ((𝜁 → (𝜓 → 𝜎)) → (𝜁 → 𝜎))) → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑))))
4		adh-minim-ax1-ax2-lem4 48168	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → (𝜓 → 𝜑)) → (𝜓 → ((𝜂 → ((𝜁 → (𝜓 → 𝜎)) → (𝜁 → 𝜎))) → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑)))) → (((𝜓 → 𝜑) → ((𝜓 → ((𝜂 → ((𝜁 → (𝜓 → 𝜎)) → (𝜁 → 𝜎))) → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑))) → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑)))) → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑)))))
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) → ((𝜓 → ((𝜂 → ((𝜁 → (𝜓 → 𝜎)) → (𝜁 → 𝜎))) → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑))) → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑)))) → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑))))
6	2, 5	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑)))
7		adh-minim-ax1-ax2-lem4 48168	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑))) → ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑)) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))))
8	6, 7	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 → ((𝜒 → ((𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) → 𝜑)) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
9	1, 8	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7

This theorem is used by:  adh-minim-ax2-lem5  48170  adh-minim-idALT  48174  adh-minim-pm2.43  48175