Axiom ax-tco 36927

Description: The Axiom of Transitive Containment of ZF set theory. It was derived as axtco 36926 above and is therefore redundant if we assume ax-ext 2733, ax-rep 5237 and ax-inf2 9609, but we state it as a separate axiom here so that its uses can be identified more easily. It states that a transitive set 𝑦 exists that contains a given set 𝑥. In particular, the transitive closure of 𝑥 is a set, since it is a subset of 𝑦, see df-tc 9703.

Traditionally, this statement is not counted as an axiom at all, but as a theorem from Replacement and Infinity. In fact, from the transitive closure of 𝑥 we can construct the set of iterated unions of 𝑥 (and vice versa), and Skolem took the existence of the latter set as a motivation for introducing the Axiom of Replacement. But Transitive Containment is strictly weaker than either of those axioms, so many authors identify it as its own axiom when investigating subsystems of ZF, such as Zermelo set theory or finitist set theory. We follow this separation in order to avoid nonessential usage of the stronger axioms.

There are two main versions of this axiom that appear in the literature: the strong form ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦), see axtco1 36928 and axtco1g 36931, and the weak form ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦), see axtco2 36929 and axtco2g 36932. The weak form follows directly from the strong form, see axtco2 36929. But the strong form only follows from the weak form if we allow el 5419 or one of its variants, see axtco1from2 36930. We take the strong form here as the axiom, since it is slightly shorter when expanded to primitive symbols. Yet the weak form turns out to be more suitable for axtcond 36933 for reasons of syntax. (Contributed by Matthew House, 6-Apr-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax-tco	⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝑧

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-tco

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vx	. . . 4 setvar 𝑥
2		vy	. . . 4 setvar 𝑦
3	1, 2	wel 2142	. . 3 wff 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
4		vz	. . . . . 6 setvar 𝑧
5	4, 2	wel 2142	. . . . 5 wff 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
6		vw	. . . . . . . 8 setvar 𝑤
7	6, 4	wel 2142	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧
8	6, 2	wel 2142	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦
9	7, 8	wi 4	. . . . . 6 wff (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)
10	9, 6	wal 1566	. . . . 5 wff ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)
11	5, 10	wi 4	. . . 4 wff (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))
12	11, 4	wal 1566	. . 3 wff ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))
13	3, 12	wa 400	. 2 wff (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
14	13, 2	wex 1807	1 wff ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))

This axiom is referenced by:  axtco1  36928  axuntco  36934  axnulregtco  36935  elALTtco  36936