Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 367 of 460) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28856) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28857-30379) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30380-45992) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | ax12eq 36601 | Basis step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 36549 without using ax-c15 36549. Atomic formula for equality predicate. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑤)))) | ||
Theorem | ax12el 36602 | Basis step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 36549 without using ax-c15 36549. Atomic formula for membership predicate. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤)))) | ||
Theorem | ax12indn 36603 | Induction step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 36549 without using ax-c15 36549. Negation case. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑)))) | ||
Theorem | ax12indi 36604 | Induction step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 36549 without using ax-c15 36549. Implication case. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) & ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓)))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))))) | ||
Theorem | ax12indalem 36605 | Lemma for ax12inda2 36607 and ax12inda 36608. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧𝜑))))) | ||
Theorem | ax12inda2ALT 36606* | Alternate proof of ax12inda2 36607, slightly more direct and not requiring ax-c16 36552. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧𝜑)))) | ||
Theorem | ax12inda2 36607* | Induction step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 36549 without using ax-c15 36549. Quantification case. When 𝑧 and 𝑦 are distinct, this theorem avoids the dummy variables needed by the more general ax12inda 36608. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧𝜑)))) | ||
Theorem | ax12inda 36608* | Induction step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 36549 without using ax-c15 36549. Quantification case. (When 𝑧 and 𝑦 are distinct, ax12inda2 36607 may be used instead to avoid the dummy variable 𝑤 in the proof.) (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧𝜑)))) | ||
Theorem | ax12v2-o 36609* | Rederivation of ax-c15 36549 from ax12v 2180 (without using ax-c15 36549 or the full ax-12 2179). Thus, the hypothesis (ax12v 2180) provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax-c15 36549. See also axc15 2423. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) | ||
Theorem | ax12a2-o 36610* | Derive ax-c15 36549 from a hypothesis in the form of ax-12 2179, without using ax-12 2179 or ax-c15 36549. The hypothesis is weaker than ax-12 2179, with 𝑧 both distinct from 𝑥 and not occurring in 𝜑. Thus, the hypothesis provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax-12 2179, if we also have ax-c11 36547, which this proof uses. As Theorem ax12 2424 shows, the distinct variable conditions are optional. An open problem is whether we can derive this with ax-c11n 36548 instead of ax-c11 36547. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) | ||
Theorem | axc11-o 36611 |
Show that ax-c11 36547 can be derived from ax-c11n 36548 and ax-12 2179. An open
problem is whether this theorem can be derived from ax-c11n 36548 and the
others when ax-12 2179 is replaced with ax-c15 36549 or ax12v 2180. See Theorems
axc11nfromc11 36586 for the rederivation of ax-c11n 36548 from axc11 2431.
Normally, axc11 2431 should be used rather than ax-c11 36547 or axc11-o 36611, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | fsumshftd 36612* | Index shift of a finite sum with a weaker "implicit substitution" hypothesis than fsumshft 15231. The proof demonstrates how this can be derived starting from from fsumshft 15231. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 = (𝑘 − 𝐾)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 = Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝑀 + 𝐾)...(𝑁 + 𝐾))𝐵) | ||
Axiom | ax-riotaBAD 36613 | Define restricted description binder. In case it doesn't exist, we return a set which is not a member of the domain of discourse 𝐴. See also comments for df-iota 6298. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) WARNING: THIS "AXIOM", WHICH IS THE OLD df-riota 7130, CONFLICTS WITH (THE NEW) df-riota 7130 AND MAKES THE SYSTEM IN set.mm INCONSISTENT. IT IS TEMPORARY AND WILL BE DELETED AFTER ALL USES ARE ELIMINATED. |
⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = if(∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑, (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)), (Undef‘{𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴})) | ||
Theorem | riotaclbgBAD 36614* | Closure of restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | riotaclbBAD 36615* | Closure of restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | riotasvd 36616* | Deduction version of riotasv 36619. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝑥 = 𝐶))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐷 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | riotasv2d 36617* | Value of description binder 𝐷 for a single-valued class expression 𝐶(𝑦) (as in e.g. reusv2 5271). Special case of riota2f 7155. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝑥 = 𝐶))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐸) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐸) → 𝐶 = 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐷 = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | riotasv2s 36618* | The value of description binder 𝐷 for a single-valued class expression 𝐶(𝑦) (as in e.g. reusv2 5271) in the form of a substitution instance. Special case of riota2f 7155. (Contributed by NM, 3-Mar-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐸 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐸 / 𝑦]𝜑)) → 𝐷 = ⦋𝐸 / 𝑦⦌𝐶) | ||
Theorem | riotasv 36619* | Value of description binder 𝐷 for a single-valued class expression 𝐶(𝑦) (as in e.g. reusv2 5271). Special case of riota2f 7155. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐷 = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | riotasv3d 36620* | A property 𝜒 holding for a representative of a single-valued class expression 𝐶(𝑦) (see e.g. reusv2 5271) also holds for its description binder 𝐷 (in the form of property 𝜃). (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝑥 = 𝐶))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | elimhyps 36621 | A version of elimhyp 4480 using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ [if(𝜑, 𝑥, 𝐵) / 𝑥]𝜑 | ||
Theorem | dedths 36622 | A version of weak deduction theorem dedth 4473 using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ [if(𝜑, 𝑥, 𝐵) / 𝑥]𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | renegclALT 36623 | Closure law for negative of reals. Demonstrates use of weak deduction theorem with explicit substitution. The proof is much longer than that of renegcl 11030. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → -𝐴 ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | elimhyps2 36624 | Generalization of elimhyps 36621 that is not useful unless we can separately prove ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ [if([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) / 𝑥]𝜑 | ||
Theorem | dedths2 36625 | Generalization of dedths 36622 that is not useful unless we can separately prove ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ [if([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) / 𝑥]𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) | ||
Theorem | nfcxfrdf 36626 | A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) | ||
Theorem | nfded 36627 | A deduction theorem that converts a not-free inference directly to deduction form. The first hypothesis is the hypothesis of the deduction form. The second is an equality deduction (e.g., (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐴} = ∪ 𝐴)) that starts from abidnf 3603. The last is assigned to the inference form (e.g., Ⅎ𝑥∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐴}) whose hypothesis is satisfied using nfaba1 2908. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶) | ||
Theorem | nfded2 36628 | A deduction theorem that converts a not-free inference directly to deduction form. The first 2 hypotheses are the hypotheses of the deduction form. The third is an equality deduction (e.g., ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → 〈{𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐵}〉 = 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) for nfopd 4779) that starts from abidnf 3603. The last is assigned to the inference form (e.g., Ⅎ𝑥〈{𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐵}〉 for nfop 4778) whose hypotheses are satisfied using nfaba1 2908. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) & ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐷) | ||
Theorem | nfunidALT2 36629 | Deduction version of nfuni 4804. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∪ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | nfunidALT 36630 | Deduction version of nfuni 4804. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∪ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | nfopdALT 36631 | Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfop 4778. This shows how the deduction version of a not-free theorem such as nfop 4778 can be created from the corresponding not-free inference theorem. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
Theorem | cnaddcom 36632 | Recover the commutative law of addition for complex numbers from the Abelian group structure. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | toycom 36633* | Show the commutative law for an operation 𝑂 on a toy structure class 𝐶 of commuatitive operations on ℂ. This illustrates how a structure class can be partially specialized. In practice, we would ordinarily define a new constant such as "CAbel" in place of 𝐶. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑔 ∈ Abel ∣ (Base‘𝑔) = ℂ} & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) | ||
Syntax | clsa 36634 | Extend class notation with all 1-dim subspaces (atoms) of a left module or left vector space. |
class LSAtoms | ||
Syntax | clsh 36635 | Extend class notation with all subspaces of a left module or left vector space that are hyperplanes. |
class LSHyp | ||
Definition | df-lsatoms 36636* | Define the set of all 1-dim subspaces (atoms) of a left module or left vector space. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ LSAtoms = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ ran (𝑣 ∈ ((Base‘𝑤) ∖ {(0g‘𝑤)}) ↦ ((LSpan‘𝑤)‘{𝑣}))) | ||
Definition | df-lshyp 36637* | Define the set of all hyperplanes of a left module or left vector space. Also called co-atoms, these are subspaces that are one dimension less than the full space. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ LSHyp = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤))}) | ||
Theorem | lshpset 36638* | The set of all hyperplanes of a left module or left vector space. The vector 𝑣 is called a generating vector for the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐻 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)}) | ||
Theorem | islshp 36639* | The predicate "is a hyperplane" (of a left module or left vector space). (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑈 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉))) | ||
Theorem | islshpsm 36640* | Hyperplane properties expressed with subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑣})) = 𝑉))) | ||
Theorem | lshplss 36641 | A hyperplane is a subspace. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | lshpne 36642 | A hyperplane is not equal to the vector space. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) | ||
Theorem | lshpnel 36643 | A hyperplane's generating vector does not belong to the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lshpnelb 36644 | The subspace sum of a hyperplane and the span of an element equals the vector space iff the element is not in the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉)) | ||
Theorem | lshpnel2N 36645 | Condition that determines a hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉)) | ||
Theorem | lshpne0 36646 | The member of the span in the hyperplane definition does not belong to the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jul-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 19-Jul-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) | ||
Theorem | lshpdisj 36647 | A hyperplane and the span in the hyperplane definition are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∩ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = { 0 }) | ||
Theorem | lshpcmp 36648 | If two hyperplanes are comparable, they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lshpinN 36649 | The intersection of two different hyperplanes is not a hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) ∈ 𝐻 ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsatset 36650* | The set of all 1-dim subspaces (atoms) of a left module or left vector space. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐴 = ran (𝑣 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 }) ↦ (𝑁‘{𝑣}))) | ||
Theorem | islsat 36651* | The predicate "is a 1-dim subspace (atom)" (of a left module or left vector space). (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 })𝑈 = (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) | ||
Theorem | lsatlspsn2 36652 | The span of a nonzero singleton is an atom. TODO: make this obsolete and use lsatlspsn 36653 instead? (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → (𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | lsatlspsn 36653 | The span of a nonzero singleton is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 })) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | islsati 36654* | A 1-dim subspace (atom) (of a left module or left vector space) equals the span of some vector. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 𝑈 = (𝑁‘{𝑣})) | ||
Theorem | lsateln0 36655* | A 1-dim subspace (atom) (of a left module or left vector space) contains a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 𝑣 ≠ 0 ) | ||
Theorem | lsatlss 36656 | The set of 1-dim subspaces is a set of subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | lsatlssel 36657 | An atom is a subspace. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | lsatssv 36658 | An atom is a set of vectors. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ 𝑉) | ||
Theorem | lsatn0 36659 | A 1-dim subspace (atom) of a left module or left vector space is nonzero. (atne0 30283 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ { 0 }) | ||
Theorem | lsatspn0 36660 | The span of a vector is an atom iff the vector is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ 0 )) | ||
Theorem | lsator0sp 36661 | The span of a vector is either an atom or the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑁‘{𝑋}) = { 0 })) | ||
Theorem | lsatssn0 36662 | A subspace (or any class) including an atom is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ { 0 }) | ||
Theorem | lsatcmp 36663 | If two atoms are comparable, they are equal. (atsseq 30285 analog.) TODO: can lspsncmp 20010 shorten this? (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsatcmp2 36664 | If an atom is included in at-most an atom, they are equal. More general version of lsatcmp 36663. TODO: can lspsncmp 20010 shorten this? (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑈 = { 0 })) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsatel 36665 | A nonzero vector in an atom determines the atom. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝑁‘{𝑋})) | ||
Theorem | lsatelbN 36666 | A nonzero vector in an atom determines the atom. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 })) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑈 = (𝑁‘{𝑋}))) | ||
Theorem | lsat2el 36667 | Two atoms sharing a nonzero vector are equal. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = 𝑄) | ||
Theorem | lsmsat 36668* | Convert comparison of atom with sum of subspaces to a comparison to sum with atom. (elpaddatiN 37465 analog.) TODO: any way to shorten this? (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ≠ { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑄 ⊆ (𝑝 ⊕ 𝑈))) | ||
Theorem | lsatfixedN 36669* | Show equality with the span of the sum of two vectors, one of which (𝑋) is fixed in advance. Compare lspfixed 20022. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ (𝑁‘{𝑌})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ (𝑁‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘{𝑌}) ∖ { 0 })𝑄 = (𝑁‘{(𝑋 + 𝑧)})) | ||
Theorem | lsmsatcv 36670 | Subspace sum has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Similar to Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (spansncvi 29590 analog.) Explicit atom version of lsmcv 20035. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑄)) → 𝑈 = (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | lssatomic 36671* | The lattice of subspaces is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. (shatomici 30296 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ { 0 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑞 ⊆ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lssats 36672* | The lattice of subspaces is atomistic, i.e. any element is the supremum of its atoms. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. Hypothesis (shatomistici 30299 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑈 = (𝑁‘∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑈})) | ||
Theorem | lpssat 36673* | Two subspaces in a proper subset relationship imply the existence of an atom less than or equal to one but not the other. (chpssati 30301 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑞 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ⊆ 𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | lrelat 36674* | Subspaces are relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (chrelati 30302 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑇 ⊊ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑞) ∧ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑞) ⊆ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lssatle 36675* | The ordering of two subspaces is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat3 30309 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑇 → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑈))) | ||
Theorem | lssat 36676* | Two subspaces in a proper subset relationship imply the existence of a 1-dim subspace less than or equal to one but not the other. (chpssati 30301 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑉) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | islshpat 36677* | Hyperplane properties expressed with subspace sum and an atom. TODO: can proof be shortened? Seems long for a simple variation of islshpsm 36640. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑞) = 𝑉))) | ||
Syntax | clcv 36678 | Extend class notation with the covering relation for a left module or left vector space. |
class ⋖L | ||
Definition | df-lcv 36679* | Define the covering relation for subspaces of a left vector space. Similar to Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. Ptak/Pulmannova's notation 𝐴( ⋖L ‘𝑊)𝐵 is read "𝐵 covers 𝐴 " or "𝐴 is covered by 𝐵 " , and it means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. See lcvbr 36681 for binary relation. (df-cv 30217 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ⋖L = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ {〈𝑡, 𝑢〉 ∣ ((𝑡 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑢 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤)) ∧ (𝑡 ⊊ 𝑢 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤)(𝑡 ⊊ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊊ 𝑢)))}) | ||
Theorem | lcvfbr 36680* | The covers relation for a left vector space (or a left module). (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {〈𝑡, 𝑢〉 ∣ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑡 ⊊ 𝑢 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑡 ⊊ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊊ 𝑢)))}) | ||
Theorem | lcvbr 36681* | The covers relation for a left vector space (or a left module). (cvbr 30220 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝐶𝑈 ↔ (𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑇 ⊊ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊊ 𝑈)))) | ||
Theorem | lcvbr2 36682* | The covers relation for a left vector space (or a left module). (cvbr2 30221 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝐶𝑈 ↔ (𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ((𝑇 ⊊ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝑈) → 𝑠 = 𝑈)))) | ||
Theorem | lcvbr3 36683* | The covers relation for a left vector space (or a left module). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝐶𝑈 ↔ (𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ((𝑇 ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝑈) → (𝑠 = 𝑇 ∨ 𝑠 = 𝑈))))) | ||
Theorem | lcvpss 36684 | The covers relation implies proper subset. (cvpss 30223 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lcvnbtwn 36685 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn 30224 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅𝐶𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑅 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | lcvntr 36686 | The covers relation is not transitive. (cvntr 30230 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅𝐶𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑅𝐶𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lcvnbtwn2 36687 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn2 30225 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅𝐶𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊊ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | lcvnbtwn3 36688 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn3 30226 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅𝐶𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | lsmcv2 36689 | Subspace sum has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Proposition 1(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (spansncv2 30231 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑁‘{𝑋}) ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝐶(𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋}))) | ||
Theorem | lcvat 36690* | If a subspace covers another, it equals the other joined with some atom. This is a consequence of relative atomicity. (cvati 30304 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑞) = 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lsatcv0 36691 | An atom covers the zero subspace. (atcv0 30280 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → { 0 }𝐶𝑄) | ||
Theorem | lsatcveq0 36692 | A subspace covered by an atom must be the zero subspace. (atcveq0 30286 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈𝐶𝑄 ↔ 𝑈 = { 0 })) | ||
Theorem | lsat0cv 36693 | A subspace is an atom iff it covers the zero subspace. This could serve as an alternate definition of an atom. TODO: this is a quick-and-dirty proof that could probably be more efficient. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ { 0 }𝐶𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lcvexchlem1 36694 | Lemma for lcvexch 36699. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊊ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) ⊊ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lcvexchlem2 36695 | Lemma for lcvexch 36699. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑅 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | lcvexchlem3 36696 | Lemma for lcvexch 36699. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑈) ⊕ 𝑇) = 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | lcvexchlem4 36697 | Lemma for lcvexch 36699. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈)𝐶𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lcvexchlem5 36698 | Lemma for lcvexch 36699. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈)𝐶𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lcvexch 36699 | Subspaces satisfy the exchange axiom. Lemma 7.5 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (cvexchi 30307 analog.) TODO: combine some lemmas. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑇 ∩ 𝑈)𝐶𝑈 ↔ 𝑇𝐶(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈))) | ||
Theorem | lcvp 36700 | Covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (cvp 30313 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑈 ∩ 𝑄) = { 0 } ↔ 𝑈𝐶(𝑈 ⊕ 𝑄))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |