P. 367 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 36601-36700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	re1ax2 36601	ax-2 7 rederived from the Tarski-Bernays axiom system. Often tb-ax1 36596 is replaced with this theorem to make a "standard" system. This is because this theorem is easier to work with, despite it being longer. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 16-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	naim1 36602	Constructor theorem for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 1-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜒)))
Theorem	naim2 36603	Constructor theorem for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 1-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜑)))
Theorem	naim1i 36604	Constructor rule for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜒)
Theorem	naim2i 36605	Constructor rule for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜑)
Theorem	naim12i 36606	Constructor rule for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜒)
Theorem	nabi1i 36607	Constructor rule for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜒)
Theorem	nabi2i 36608	Constructor rule for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜑)
Theorem	nabi12i 36609	Constructor rule for ⊼. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜒)
Syntax	w3nand 36610	The double nand.
wff (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)
Definition	df-3nand 36611	The double nand. This definition allows to express the input of three variables only being false if all three are true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒)))
Theorem	df3nandALT1 36612	The double nand expressed in terms of pure nand. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ⊼ ((𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒))))
Theorem	df3nandALT2 36613	The double nand expressed in terms of negation and and not. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	andnand1 36614	Double and in terms of double nand. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)))
Theorem	imnand2 36615	An → nand relation. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 2-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜑) ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜓)))
21.14.2  Predicate Calculus
Theorem	nalfal 36616	Not all sets hold ⊥ as true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥⊥
Theorem	nexntru 36617	There does not exist a set such that ⊤ is not true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ ⊤
Theorem	nexfal 36618	There does not exist a set such that ⊥ is true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥⊥
Theorem	neufal 36619	There does not exist exactly one set such that ⊥ is true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∃!𝑥⊥
Theorem	neutru 36620	There does not exist exactly one set such that ⊤ is true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∃!𝑥⊤
Theorem	nmotru 36621	There does not exist at most one set such that ⊤ is true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∃*𝑥⊤
Theorem	mofal 36622	There exist at most one set such that ⊥ is true. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ∃*𝑥⊥
Theorem	nrmo 36623	"At most one" restricted existential quantifier for a statement which is never true. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
21.14.3  Miscellaneous single axioms
Theorem	meran1 36624	A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by C. A. Meredith. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (¬ (¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))) ∨ (¬ (¬ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜑) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜏 ∨ 𝜑))))
Theorem	meran2 36625	A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by C. A. Meredith. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (¬ (¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))) ∨ (¬ (¬ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜃))))
Theorem	meran3 36626	A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by C. A. Meredith. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (¬ (¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))) ∨ (¬ (¬ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 ∨ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜑))))
Theorem	waj-ax 36627	A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by Mordchaj Wajsberg (Logical Works, Polish Academy of Sciences, 1977). See: Fitelson, Some recent results in algebra and logical calculi obtained using automated reasoning, 2003 (axiom W on slide 8). (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)) ⊼ (((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃))) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓))))
Theorem	lukshef-ax2 36628	A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by Jan Lukasiewicz. See: Fitelson, Some recent results in algebra and logical calculi obtained using automated reasoning, 2003 (axiom L2 on slide 8). (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 14-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜒 ⊼ 𝜑)) ⊼ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜓) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))))
Theorem	arg-ax 36629	A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by Ken Harris and Branden Fitelson. See: Fitelson, Some recent results in algebra and logical calculi obtained using automated reasoning, 2003 (axiom HF1 on slide 8). (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 14-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)) ⊼ ((𝜑 ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒)) ⊼ ((𝜃 ⊼ 𝜒) ⊼ ((𝜒 ⊼ 𝜃) ⊼ (𝜑 ⊼ 𝜃)))))
21.14.4  Connective Symmetry
Theorem	negsym1 36630	In the paper "On Variable Functors of Propositional Arguments", Lukasiewicz introduced a system that can handle variable connectives. This was done by introducing a variable, marked with a lowercase delta, which takes a wff as input. In the system, "delta 𝜑 " means that "something is true of 𝜑". The expression "delta 𝜑 " can be substituted with ¬ 𝜑, 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑, ∀𝑥𝜑, etc. Later on, Meredith discovered a single axiom, in the form of ( delta delta ⊥ → delta 𝜑 ). This represents the shortest theorem in the extended propositional calculus that cannot be derived as an instance of a theorem in propositional calculus. A symmetry with ¬. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ ⊥ → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	imsym1 36631	A symmetry with →. See negsym1 36630 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜓 → ⊥)) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	bisym1 36632	A symmetry with ↔. See negsym1 36630 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ ⊥)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	consym1 36633	A symmetry with ∧. See negsym1 36630 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ ⊥)) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	dissym1 36634	A symmetry with ∨. See negsym1 36630 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ ⊥)) → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	nandsym1 36635	A symmetry with ⊼. See negsym1 36630 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ⊼ (𝜓 ⊼ ⊥)) → (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜑))
Theorem	unisym1 36636	A symmetry with ∀. See negsym1 36630 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑥⊥ → ∀𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	exisym1 36637	A symmetry with ∃. See negsym1 36630 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑥⊥ → ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	unqsym1 36638	A symmetry with ∃!. See negsym1 36630 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 6-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥∃!𝑥⊥ → ∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	amosym1 36639	A symmetry with ∃*. See negsym1 36630 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥∃*𝑥⊥ → ∃*𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	subsym1 36640	A symmetry with [𝑥 / 𝑦]. See negsym1 36630 for more information. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 11-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑦 / 𝑥]⊥ → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
21.15  Mathbox for Chen-Pang He
21.15.1  Ordinal topology
Theorem	ontopbas 36641	An ordinal number is a topological basis. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 8-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → 𝐵 ∈ TopBases)
Theorem	onsstopbas 36642	The class of ordinal numbers is a subclass of the class of topological bases. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 8-Oct-2015.)
⊢ On ⊆ TopBases
Theorem	onpsstopbas 36643	The class of ordinal numbers is a proper subclass of the class of topological bases. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 9-Oct-2015.)
⊢ On ⊊ TopBases
Theorem	ontgval 36644	The topology generated from an ordinal number 𝐵 is suc ∪ 𝐵. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 10-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (topGen‘𝐵) = suc ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	ontgsucval 36645	The topology generated from a successor ordinal number is itself. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 11-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (topGen‘suc 𝐴) = suc 𝐴)
Theorem	onsuctop 36646	A successor ordinal number is a topology. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 11-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ Top)
Theorem	onsuctopon 36647	One of the topologies on an ordinal number is its successor. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 7-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴))
Theorem	ordtoplem 36648	Membership of the class of successor ordinals. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 1-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ On → suc ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 ≠ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆))
Theorem	ordtop 36649	An ordinal is a topology iff it is not its supremum (union), proven without the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 1-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐽 → (𝐽 ∈ Top ↔ 𝐽 ≠ ∪ 𝐽))
Theorem	onsucconni 36650	A successor ordinal number is a connected topology. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 16-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ suc 𝐴 ∈ Conn
Theorem	onsucconn 36651	A successor ordinal number is a connected topology. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 16-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ Conn)
Theorem	ordtopconn 36652	An ordinal topology is connected. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 1-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐽 → (𝐽 ∈ Top ↔ 𝐽 ∈ Conn))
Theorem	onintopssconn 36653	An ordinal topology is connected, expressed in constants. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 16-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (On ∩ Top) ⊆ Conn
Theorem	onsuct0 36654	A successor ordinal number is a T0 space. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 8-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ Kol2)
Theorem	ordtopt0 36655	An ordinal topology is T0. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 8-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐽 → (𝐽 ∈ Top ↔ 𝐽 ∈ Kol2))
Theorem	onsucsuccmpi 36656	The successor of a successor ordinal number is a compact topology, proven without the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 18-Oct-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ suc suc 𝐴 ∈ Comp
Theorem	onsucsuccmp 36657	The successor of a successor ordinal number is a compact topology. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 18-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc suc 𝐴 ∈ Comp)
Theorem	limsucncmpi 36658	The successor of a limit ordinal is not compact. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 20-Oct-2015.)
⊢ Lim 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ suc 𝐴 ∈ Comp
Theorem	limsucncmp 36659	The successor of a limit ordinal is not compact. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 20-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → ¬ suc 𝐴 ∈ Comp)
Theorem	ordcmp 36660	An ordinal topology is compact iff the underlying set is its supremum (union) only when the ordinal is 1o. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 1-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ Comp ↔ (∪ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝐴 = 1o)))
Theorem	ssoninhaus 36661	The ordinal topologies 1o and 2o are Hausdorff. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 10-Nov-2015.)
⊢ {1o, 2o} ⊆ (On ∩ Haus)
Theorem	onint1 36662	The ordinal T1 spaces are 1o and 2o, proven without the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 9-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (On ∩ Fre) = {1o, 2o}
Theorem	oninhaus 36663	The ordinal Hausdorff spaces are 1o and 2o. (Contributed by Chen-Pang He, 10-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (On ∩ Haus) = {1o, 2o}
21.16  Mathbox for Jeff Hoffman
21.16.1  Inferences for finite induction on generic function values
Theorem	fveleq 36664	Please add description here. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 12-Feb-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ 𝑃)))
Theorem	findfvcl 36665*	Please add description here. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 12-Feb-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑃))
Theorem	findreccl 36666*	Please add description here. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 19-Feb-2008.)
⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 → (rec(𝐺, 𝐴)‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑃))
Theorem	findabrcl 36667*	Please add description here. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 16-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (rec(𝐺, 𝐴)‘𝑥))‘𝐶) ∈ 𝑃)
21.16.2  gdc.mm
Theorem	nnssi2 36668	Convert a theorem for real/complex numbers into one for positive integers. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Jun-2008.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ 𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → 𝜓)
Theorem	nnssi3 36669	Convert a theorem for real/complex numbers into one for positive integers. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Jun-2008.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ 𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) → 𝜓)
Theorem	nndivsub 36670	Please add description here. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Jun-2008.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((𝐴 / 𝐶) ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵)) → ((𝐵 / 𝐶) ∈ ℕ ↔ ((𝐵 − 𝐴) / 𝐶) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	nndivlub 36671	A factor of a positive integer cannot exceed it. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Jun-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℕ → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
Syntax	cgcdOLD 36672	Extend class notation to include the gdc function. (New usage is discouraged.)
class gcdOLD (𝐴, 𝐵)
Definition	df-gcdOLD 36673*	gcdOLD (𝐴, 𝐵) is the largest positive integer that evenly divides both 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Jun-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ gcdOLD (𝐴, 𝐵) = sup({𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ ((𝐴 / 𝑥) ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐵 / 𝑥) ∈ ℕ)}, ℕ, < )
Theorem	ee7.2aOLD 36674	Lemma for Euclid's Elements, Book 7, proposition 2. The original mentions the smaller measure being 'continually subtracted' from the larger. Many authors interpret this phrase as 𝐴 mod 𝐵. Here, just one subtraction step is proved to preserve the gcdOLD. The rec function will be used in other proofs for iterated subtraction. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Jun-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → gcdOLD (𝐴, 𝐵) = gcdOLD (𝐴, (𝐵 − 𝐴))))
21.17  Mathbox for Matthew House
21.17.1  Relations on well-ordered indexed unions
Theorem	weiunval 36675*	Value of the relation constructed in weiunpo 36678, weiunso 36679, weiunfr 36680, and weiunse 36681. (Contributed by Matthew House, 8-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑢 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵}∀𝑣 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵} ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑦)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑧) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ 𝑦⦋(𝐹‘𝑦) / 𝑥⦌𝑆𝑧)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶𝑇𝐷 ↔ ((𝐶 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝐶)𝑅(𝐹‘𝐷) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐷) ∧ 𝐶⦋(𝐹‘𝐶) / 𝑥⦌𝑆𝐷))))
Theorem	weiunlem 36676*	Lemma for weiunpo 36678, weiunso 36679, weiunfr 36680, and weiunse 36681. (Contributed by Matthew House, 23-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑢 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵}∀𝑣 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵} ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑦)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑧) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ 𝑦⦋(𝐹‘𝑦) / 𝑥⦌𝑆𝑧)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝑡 ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘𝑡) / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑡 ∈ ⦋ 𝑠 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ¬ 𝑠𝑅(𝐹‘𝑡)))
Theorem	weiunfrlem 36677*	Lemma for weiunfr 36680. (Contributed by Matthew House, 23-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑢 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵}∀𝑣 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵} ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑦)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑧) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ 𝑦⦋(𝐹‘𝑦) / 𝑥⦌𝑆𝑧)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (℩𝑝 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑟)∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑟) ¬ 𝑞𝑅𝑝)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑟 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑟 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑟) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝑟 ¬ (𝐹‘𝑡)𝑅𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ (𝑟 ∩ ⦋𝐸 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)(𝐹‘𝑡) = 𝐸))
Theorem	weiunpo 36678*	A partial ordering on an indexed union can be constructed from a well-ordering on its index class and a collection of partial orderings on its members. (Contributed by Matthew House, 23-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑢 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵}∀𝑣 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵} ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑦)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑧) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ 𝑦⦋(𝐹‘𝑦) / 𝑥⦌𝑆𝑧)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑆 Po 𝐵) → 𝑇 Po ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	weiunso 36679*	A strict ordering on an indexed union can be constructed from a well-ordering on its index class and a collection of strict orderings on its members. (Contributed by Matthew House, 23-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑢 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵}∀𝑣 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵} ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑦)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑧) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ 𝑦⦋(𝐹‘𝑦) / 𝑥⦌𝑆𝑧)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑆 Or 𝐵) → 𝑇 Or ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	weiunfr 36680*	A well-founded relation on an indexed union can be constructed from a well-ordering on its index class and a collection of well-founded relations on its members. (Contributed by Matthew House, 23-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑢 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵}∀𝑣 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵} ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑦)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑧) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ 𝑦⦋(𝐹‘𝑦) / 𝑥⦌𝑆𝑧)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑆 Fr 𝐵) → 𝑇 Fr ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	weiunse 36681*	The relation constructed in weiunpo 36678, weiunso 36679, weiunfr 36680, and weiunwe 36682 is set-like if all members of the indexed union are sets. (Contributed by Matthew House, 23-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑢 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵}∀𝑣 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵} ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑦)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑧) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ 𝑦⦋(𝐹‘𝑦) / 𝑥⦌𝑆𝑧)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑇 Se ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	weiunwe 36682*	A well-ordering on an indexed union can be constructed from a well-ordering on its index class and a collection of well-orderings on its members. (Contributed by Matthew House, 23-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑢 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵}∀𝑣 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵} ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑦)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑧) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ 𝑦⦋(𝐹‘𝑦) / 𝑥⦌𝑆𝑧)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑆 We 𝐵) → 𝑇 We ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	numiunnum 36683*	An indexed union of sets is numerable if its index set is numerable and there exists a collection of well-orderings on its members. (Contributed by Matthew House, 23-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑆 We 𝐵)) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
21.17.2  Stronger axioms of regularity This section contains some experiments related to the Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 9509. As written, ax-reg 9509 cannot guarantee that all sets are well-founded unless we further assume ax-inf 9559 / ax-inf2 9562; in particular, ax-reg 9509 alone is insufficient to assert that every set has a transitive closure (tz9.1 9650), even though this is true among the hereditarily finite sets. The underlying cause of this issue is that ax-reg 9509 requires a witness set to detect non-well-foundedness, but if all sets are hereditarily finite, then there may be no such witness set for an infinite descending ∈-chain. The question is, how can we strengthen ax-reg 9509 so that we get a true "Axiom of Foundation" even in the absence of ax-inf 9559 / ax-inf2 9562 (e.g., so that we can prove unir1 9737 ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) = V)? There are a few possible solutions. First, we can directly strengthen ax-reg 9509 into ax-regs 35301, which asserts that every class {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} has an ∈-minimal element. Second, we can keep ax-reg 9509 and add exeltr 36684, which asserts that every set is a member of a transitive set. Third, we can replace ax-reg 9509 with a set-induction axiom mh-setind 36685. Fourth, we can take unir1 9737 as an axiom and derive everything from that. This list is far from exhaustive. In this section, we prove that these four listed principles are equivalent. We see that ax-regs 35301 implies the other three principles: ax-reg 9509 + exeltr 36684 via axreg 35302 + tz9.1regs 35309, mh-setind 36685 via setindregs 35305, and unir1 9737 via unir1regs 35310. So we just have to show that ax-regs 35301 is implied by each of the other three. Some questions: When expanded to primitives, what is the shortest single axiom equivalent to these, over ZF minus ax-reg 9509 and ax-inf 9559 / ax-inf2 9562? One candidate is mh-setind 36685, with 19 primitives. What is the shortest single axiom not using any wff variables? The conjunction of ax-reg 9509 + exeltr 36684, expanded and slightly simplified, comes out to 46 primitives. Can we do better?
Theorem	exeltr 36684*	Every set is a member of a transitive set. This requires ax-inf2 9562 to prove, see tz9.1 9650. (Contributed by Matthew House, 4-Mar-2026.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	mh-setind 36685*	Principle of set induction setind 9668, written with primitive symbols. (Contributed by Matthew House, 4-Mar-2026.)
⊢ (∀𝑦(∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)) → 𝜑)
Theorem	mh-setindnd 36686	A version of mh-setind 36685 with no distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Matthew House, 5-Mar-2026.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑦(∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦𝜑)) → 𝜑)
Theorem	regsfromregtr 36687*	Derivation of ax-regs 35301 from ax-reg 9509 + exeltr 36684. (Contributed by Matthew House, 4-Mar-2026.)
⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ ∃𝑢(𝑣 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑢 → ∀𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑡 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑢)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑦(∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))))
Theorem	regsfromsetind 36688*	Derivation of ax-regs 35301 from mh-setind 36685. (Contributed by Matthew House, 4-Mar-2026.)
⊢ (∀𝑦(∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑)) → ¬ 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑦(∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))))
Theorem	regsfromunir1 36689*	Derivation of ax-regs 35301 from unir1 9737. (Contributed by Matthew House, 4-Mar-2026.)
⊢ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) = V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑦(∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))))
21.18  Mathbox for Asger C. Ipsen
21.18.1  Continuous nowhere differentiable functions
Theorem	dnival 36690*	Value of the "distance to nearest integer" function. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝑇‘𝐴) = (abs‘((⌊‘(𝐴 + (1 / 2))) − 𝐴)))
Theorem	dnicld1 36691	Closure theorem for the "distance to nearest integer" function. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((⌊‘(𝐴 + (1 / 2))) − 𝐴)) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	dnicld2 36692*	Closure theorem for the "distance to nearest integer" function. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	dnif 36693	The "distance to nearest integer" function is a function. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑇:ℝ⟶ℝ
Theorem	dnizeq0 36694*	The distance to nearest integer is zero for integers. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 15-Jun-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	dnizphlfeqhlf 36695*	The distance to nearest integer is a half for half-integers. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 15-Jun-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘(𝐴 + (1 / 2))) = (1 / 2))
Theorem	rddif2 36696	Variant of rddif 15276. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 0 ≤ ((1 / 2) − (abs‘((⌊‘(𝐴 + (1 / 2))) − 𝐴))))
Theorem	dnibndlem1 36697*	Lemma for dnibnd 36710. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘((𝑇‘𝐵) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) ≤ 𝑆 ↔ (abs‘((abs‘((⌊‘(𝐵 + (1 / 2))) − 𝐵)) − (abs‘((⌊‘(𝐴 + (1 / 2))) − 𝐴)))) ≤ 𝑆))
Theorem	dnibndlem2 36698*	Lemma for dnibnd 36710. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⌊‘(𝐵 + (1 / 2))) = (⌊‘(𝐴 + (1 / 2))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝐵) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) ≤ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	dnibndlem3 36699	Lemma for dnibnd 36710. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⌊‘(𝐵 + (1 / 2))) = ((⌊‘(𝐴 + (1 / 2))) + 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) = (abs‘((𝐵 − ((⌊‘(𝐵 + (1 / 2))) − (1 / 2))) + (((⌊‘(𝐴 + (1 / 2))) + (1 / 2)) − 𝐴))))
Theorem	dnibndlem4 36700	Lemma for dnibnd 36710. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ → 0 ≤ (𝐵 − ((⌊‘(𝐵 + (1 / 2))) − (1 / 2))))