Axiom ax-rep 5238

Description: Axiom of Replacement. An axiom scheme of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Axiom 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 19. It tells us that the image of any set under a function is also a set (see the variant funimaex 6623). Although 𝜑 may be any wff whatsoever, this axiom is useful (i.e. its antecedent is satisfied) when we are given some function and 𝜑 encodes the predicate "the value of the function at 𝑤 is 𝑧". Thus, 𝜑 will ordinarily have free variables 𝑤 and 𝑧- think of it informally as 𝜑(𝑤, 𝑧). We prefix 𝜑 with the quantifier ∀𝑦 in order to "protect" the axiom from any 𝜑 containing 𝑦, thus allowing us to eliminate any restrictions on 𝜑. Another common variant is derived as axrep5 5246, where you can find some further remarks. A slightly more compact version is shown as axrep2 5241. A quite different variant is zfrep6 5250, which if used in place of ax-rep 5238 would also require that the Separation Scheme axsep 5256 be stated as a separate axiom.

There is a very strong generalization of Replacement that doesn't demand function-like behavior of 𝜑. Two versions of this generalization are called the Collection Principle cp 9879 and the Boundedness Axiom bnd 9880.

Many developments of set theory distinguish the uses of Replacement from uses of the weaker axioms of Separation axsep 5256, Null Set axnul 5268, and Pairing axpr 5398, all of which we derive from Replacement. In order to make it easier to identify the uses of those redundant axioms, we restate them as Axioms ax-sep 5257, ax-nul 5269, and ax-pr 5404 below the theorems that prove them. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax-rep	⊢ (∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤)

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-rep

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wph	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝜑
2		vy	. . . . . . 7 setvar 𝑦
3	1, 2	wal 1568	. . . . . 6 wff ∀𝑦𝜑
4		vz	. . . . . . 7 setvar 𝑧
5	4, 2	weq 1992	. . . . . 6 wff 𝑧 = 𝑦
6	3, 5	wi 4	. . . . 5 wff (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
7	6, 4	wal 1568	. . . 4 wff ∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
8	7, 2	wex 1809	. . 3 wff ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
9		vw	. . 3 setvar 𝑤
10	8, 9	wal 1568	. 2 wff ∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
11	4, 2	wel 2144	. . . . 5 wff 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
12		vx	. . . . . . . 8 setvar 𝑥
13	9, 12	wel 2144	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥
14	13, 3	wa 400	. . . . . 6 wff (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)
15	14, 9	wex 1809	. . . . 5 wff ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)
16	11, 15	wb 209	. . . 4 wff (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))
17	16, 4	wal 1568	. . 3 wff ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))
18	17, 2	wex 1809	. 2 wff ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))
19	10, 18	wi 4	1 wff (∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

This axiom is used by:  axrep1  5239  axrep4v  5243  axrep4  5244  axrep6OLD  5248  axnulALT  5267  axnulALT2  35480  bj-snsetex  37627