Axiom ax-rep 5249

Description: Axiom of Replacement. An axiom scheme of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Axiom 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 19. It tells us that the image of any set under a function is also a set (see the variant funimaex 6624). Although 𝜑 may be any wff whatsoever, this axiom is useful (i.e. its antecedent is satisfied) when we are given some function and 𝜑 encodes the predicate "the value of the function at 𝑤 is 𝑧". Thus, 𝜑 will ordinarily have free variables 𝑤 and 𝑧- think of it informally as 𝜑(𝑤, 𝑧). We prefix 𝜑 with the quantifier ∀𝑦 in order to "protect" the axiom from any 𝜑 containing 𝑦, thus allowing us to eliminate any restrictions on 𝜑. Another common variant is derived as axrep5 5257, where you can find some further remarks. A slightly more compact version is shown as axrep2 5252. A quite different variant is zfrep6 7951, which if used in place of ax-rep 5249 would also require that the Separation Scheme axsep 5265 be stated as a separate axiom.

There is a very strong generalization of Replacement that doesn't demand function-like behavior of 𝜑. Two versions of this generalization are called the Collection Principle cp 9903 and the Boundedness Axiom bnd 9904.

Many developments of set theory distinguish the uses of Replacement from uses of the weaker axioms of Separation axsep 5265, Null Set axnul 5275, and Pairing axpr 5397, all of which we derive from Replacement. In order to make it easier to identify the uses of those redundant axioms, we restate them as Axioms ax-sep 5266, ax-nul 5276, and ax-pr 5402 below the theorems that prove them. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax-rep	⊢ (∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-rep

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wph	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝜑
2		vy	. . . . . . 7 setvar 𝑦
3	1, 2	wal 1538	. . . . . 6 wff ∀𝑦𝜑
4		vz	. . . . . . 7 setvar 𝑧
5	4, 2	weq 1962	. . . . . 6 wff 𝑧 = 𝑦
6	3, 5	wi 4	. . . . 5 wff (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
7	6, 4	wal 1538	. . . 4 wff ∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
8	7, 2	wex 1779	. . 3 wff ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
9		vw	. . 3 setvar 𝑤
10	8, 9	wal 1538	. 2 wff ∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
11	4, 2	wel 2109	. . . . 5 wff 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
12		vx	. . . . . . . 8 setvar 𝑥
13	9, 12	wel 2109	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥
14	13, 3	wa 395	. . . . . 6 wff (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)
15	14, 9	wex 1779	. . . . 5 wff ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)
16	11, 15	wb 206	. . . 4 wff (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))
17	16, 4	wal 1538	. . 3 wff ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))
18	17, 2	wex 1779	. 2 wff ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))
19	10, 18	wi 4	1 wff (∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

This axiom is referenced by:  axrep1  5250  axrep4v  5254  axrep4  5255  axrep6OLD  5259  axnulALT  5274  bj-snsetex  36927