Axiom ax-rep 5209

Description: Axiom of Replacement. An axiom scheme of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Axiom 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 19. It tells us that the image of any set under a function is also a set (see the variant funimaex 6521). Although 𝜑 may be any wff whatsoever, this axiom is useful (i.e. its antecedent is satisfied) when we are given some function and 𝜑 encodes the predicate "the value of the function at 𝑤 is 𝑧". Thus, 𝜑 will ordinarily have free variables 𝑤 and 𝑧- think of it informally as 𝜑(𝑤, 𝑧). We prefix 𝜑 with the quantifier ∀𝑦 in order to "protect" the axiom from any 𝜑 containing 𝑦, thus allowing us to eliminate any restrictions on 𝜑. Another common variant is derived as axrep5 5215, where you can find some further remarks. A slightly more compact version is shown as axrep2 5212. A quite different variant is zfrep6 7797, which if used in place of ax-rep 5209 would also require that the Separation Scheme axsep 5222 be stated as a separate axiom.

There is a very strong generalization of Replacement that doesn't demand function-like behavior of 𝜑. Two versions of this generalization are called the Collection Principle cp 9649 and the Boundedness Axiom bnd 9650.

Many developments of set theory distinguish the uses of Replacement from uses of the weaker axioms of Separation axsep 5222, Null Set axnul 5229, and Pairing axpr 5351, all of which we derive from Replacement. In order to make it easier to identify the uses of those redundant axioms, we restate them as Axioms ax-sep 5223, ax-nul 5230, and ax-pr 5352 below the theorems that prove them. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax-rep	⊢ (∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-rep

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wph	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝜑
2		vy	. . . . . . 7 setvar 𝑦
3	1, 2	wal 1537	. . . . . 6 wff ∀𝑦𝜑
4		vz	. . . . . . 7 setvar 𝑧
5	4, 2	weq 1966	. . . . . 6 wff 𝑧 = 𝑦
6	3, 5	wi 4	. . . . 5 wff (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
7	6, 4	wal 1537	. . . 4 wff ∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
8	7, 2	wex 1782	. . 3 wff ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
9		vw	. . 3 setvar 𝑤
10	8, 9	wal 1537	. 2 wff ∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)
11	4, 2	wel 2107	. . . . 5 wff 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
12		vx	. . . . . . . 8 setvar 𝑥
13	9, 12	wel 2107	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥
14	13, 3	wa 396	. . . . . 6 wff (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)
15	14, 9	wex 1782	. . . . 5 wff ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)
16	11, 15	wb 205	. . . 4 wff (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))
17	16, 4	wal 1537	. . 3 wff ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))
18	17, 2	wex 1782	. 2 wff ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))
19	10, 18	wi 4	1 wff (∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

This axiom is referenced by:  axrep1  5210  axrep6  5216  axnulALT  5228  bj-snsetex  35153