Theorem mdandyv0 46907

Description: Given the equivalences set in the hypotheses, there exist a proof where ch, th, ta, et match ph, ps accordingly. (Contributed by Jarvin Udandy, 6-Sep-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mdandyv0.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ⊥)
mdandyv0.2	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ⊤)
mdandyv0.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ⊥)
mdandyv0.4	⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ⊥)
mdandyv0.5	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ ⊥)
mdandyv0.6	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ⊥)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mdandyv0	⊢ ((((𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜑)) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜑)) ∧ (𝜂 ↔ 𝜑))

Proof of Theorem mdandyv0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mdandyv0.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ⊥)
2		mdandyv0.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ⊥)
3	1, 2	bothfbothsame 46858	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑)
4		mdandyv0.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ⊥)
5	4, 2	bothfbothsame 46858	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜑)
6	3, 5	pm3.2i 470	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜑))
7		mdandyv0.5	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ ⊥)
8	7, 2	bothfbothsame 46858	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜑)
9	6, 8	pm3.2i 470	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜑)) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜑))
10		mdandyv0.6	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ⊥)
11	10, 2	bothfbothsame 46858	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ 𝜑)
12	9, 11	pm3.2i 470	1 ⊢ ((((𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜑)) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜑)) ∧ (𝜂 ↔ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ⊤wtru 1540  ⊥wfal 1551

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396

This theorem is referenced by: (None)