Theorem mdandyv14 43193

Description: Given the equivalences set in the hypotheses, there exist a proof where ch, th, ta, et match ph, ps accordingly. (Contributed by Jarvin Udandy, 6-Sep-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mdandyv14.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ⊥)
mdandyv14.2	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ⊤)
mdandyv14.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ⊥)
mdandyv14.4	⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ⊤)
mdandyv14.5	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ ⊤)
mdandyv14.6	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ⊤)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mdandyv14	⊢ ((((𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ (𝜂 ↔ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem mdandyv14

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mdandyv14.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ⊥)
2		mdandyv14.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ⊥)
3	1, 2	bothfbothsame 43130	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑)
4		mdandyv14.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ⊤)
5		mdandyv14.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ⊤)
6	4, 5	bothtbothsame 43129	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓)
7	3, 6	pm3.2i 473	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))
8		mdandyv14.5	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ ⊤)
9	8, 5	bothtbothsame 43129	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜓)
10	7, 9	pm3.2i 473	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜓))
11		mdandyv14.6	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ⊤)
12	11, 5	bothtbothsame 43129	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ 𝜓)
13	10, 12	pm3.2i 473	1 ⊢ ((((𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) ∧ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ (𝜂 ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398  ⊤wtru 1534  ⊥wfal 1545

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399

This theorem is referenced by: (None)