Mathbox for Jarvin Udandy |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > mdandyvrx6 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Given the exclusivities set in the hypotheses, there exist a proof where ch, th, ta, et exclude ze, si accordingly. (Contributed by Jarvin Udandy, 7-Sep-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
mdandyvrx6.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜁) |
mdandyvrx6.2 | ⊢ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜎) |
mdandyvrx6.3 | ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) |
mdandyvrx6.4 | ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓) |
mdandyvrx6.5 | ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜓) |
mdandyvrx6.6 | ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ 𝜑) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
mdandyvrx6 | ⊢ ((((𝜒 ⊻ 𝜁) ∧ (𝜃 ⊻ 𝜎)) ∧ (𝜏 ⊻ 𝜎)) ∧ (𝜂 ⊻ 𝜁)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | mdandyvrx6.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜁) | |
2 | mdandyvrx6.3 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) | |
3 | 1, 2 | axorbciffatcxorb 44360 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒 ⊻ 𝜁) |
4 | mdandyvrx6.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜎) | |
5 | mdandyvrx6.4 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓) | |
6 | 4, 5 | axorbciffatcxorb 44360 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜃 ⊻ 𝜎) |
7 | 3, 6 | pm3.2i 471 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ⊻ 𝜁) ∧ (𝜃 ⊻ 𝜎)) |
8 | mdandyvrx6.5 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜓) | |
9 | 4, 8 | axorbciffatcxorb 44360 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜏 ⊻ 𝜎) |
10 | 7, 9 | pm3.2i 471 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝜒 ⊻ 𝜁) ∧ (𝜃 ⊻ 𝜎)) ∧ (𝜏 ⊻ 𝜎)) |
11 | mdandyvrx6.6 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ 𝜑) | |
12 | 1, 11 | axorbciffatcxorb 44360 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜂 ⊻ 𝜁) |
13 | 10, 12 | pm3.2i 471 | 1 ⊢ ((((𝜒 ⊻ 𝜁) ∧ (𝜃 ⊻ 𝜎)) ∧ (𝜏 ⊻ 𝜎)) ∧ (𝜂 ⊻ 𝜁)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 396 ⊻ wxo 1506 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-xor 1507 |
This theorem is referenced by: mdandyvrx9 44445 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |