Theorem axregndlem1 10026

Description: Lemma for the Axiom of Regularity with no distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2390. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axregndlem1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))

Proof of Theorem axregndlem1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		19.8a 2180	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
2		nfae 2455	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧
3		nfae 2455	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧
4		elirrv 9062	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥
5		elequ1 2121	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
6	4, 5	mtbii 328	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)
7	6	sps 2184	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)
8	7	pm2.21d 121	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
9	3, 8	alrimi 2213	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
10	9	anim2i 618	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
11	10	expcom 416	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))
12	2, 11	eximd 2216	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))
13	1, 12	syl5 34	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398  ∀wal 1535  ∃wex 1780

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-13 2390  ax-ext 2795  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pr 5332  ax-reg 9058

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146  df-v 3498  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-nul 4294  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572

This theorem is referenced by:  axregndlem2  10027  axregnd  10028