Theorem brabidgaw 35650

Description: The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5414. Version of brabidga 35651 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2389. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 2-Apr-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
brabidgaw.1	⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brabidgaw	⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑅(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem brabidgaw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brabidgaw.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
2	1	breqi 5065	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦)
3		df-br 5060	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
4		opabidw 5405	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
5	2, 3, 4	3bitri 299	1 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1536   ∈ wcel 2113  ⟨cop 4566   class class class wbr 5059  {copab 5121

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2792  ax-sep 5196  ax-nul 5203  ax-pr 5323

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1084  df-tru 1539  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2621  df-eu 2653  df-clab 2799  df-cleq 2813  df-clel 2892  df-nfc 2962  df-rab 3146  df-v 3493  df-dif 3932  df-un 3934  df-in 3936  df-ss 3945  df-nul 4285  df-if 4461  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563  df-op 4567  df-br 5060  df-opab 5122

This theorem is referenced by:  inxpxrn  35676