Theorem canth 6384

Description: No set 𝐴 is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e. no function can map 𝐴 it onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. For the equinumerosity version, see canth2 7873. Note that 𝐴 must be a set: this theorem does not hold when 𝐴 is too large to be a set; see ncanth 6385 for a counterexample. (Use nex 1709 if you want the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
canth.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
canth	⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴

Proof of Theorem canth

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrab2 3554	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ⊆ 𝐴
2		canth.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
3	2	elpw2 4654	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ⊆ 𝐴)
4	1, 3	mpbir 219	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
5		forn 5914	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ran 𝐹 = 𝒫 𝐴)
6	4, 5	syl5eleqr 2599	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹)
7		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
8		fveq2 5986	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
9	7, 8	eleq12d 2586	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
10	9	notbid 306	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
11	10	elrab 3235	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
12	11	baibr 942	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
13		nbbn 371	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}) ↔ ¬ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
14	12, 13	sylib 206	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
15		eleq2 2581	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} → (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
16	14, 15	nsyl 133	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})
17	16	nrex 2887	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}
18		fofn 5913	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
19		fvelrnb 6036	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
20	18, 19	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
21	17, 20	mtbiri 315	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ¬ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹)
22	6, 21	pm2.65i 183	1 ⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 194   = wceq 1474   ∈ wcel 1938  ∃wrex 2801  {crab 2804  Vcvv 3077   ⊆ wss 3444  𝒫 cpw 4011  ran crn 4933   Fn wfn 5684  –onto→wfo 5687  ‘cfv 5689

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1700  ax-4 1713  ax-5 1793  ax-6 1838  ax-7 1885  ax-9 1947  ax-10 1966  ax-11 1971  ax-12 1983  ax-13 2137  ax-ext 2494  ax-sep 4607  ax-nul 4616  ax-pr 4732

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 195  df-or 383  df-an 384  df-3an 1032  df-tru 1477  df-ex 1695  df-nf 1699  df-sb 1831  df-eu 2366  df-mo 2367  df-clab 2501  df-cleq 2507  df-clel 2510  df-nfc 2644  df-ral 2805  df-rex 2806  df-rab 2809  df-v 3079  df-sbc 3307  df-dif 3447  df-un 3449  df-in 3451  df-ss 3458  df-nul 3778  df-if 3940  df-pw 4013  df-sn 4029  df-pr 4031  df-op 4035  df-uni 4271  df-br 4482  df-opab 4542  df-mpt 4543  df-id 4847  df-xp 4938  df-rel 4939  df-cnv 4940  df-co 4941  df-dm 4942  df-rn 4943  df-iota 5653  df-fun 5691  df-fn 5692  df-f 5693  df-fo 5695  df-fv 5697

This theorem is referenced by:  canth2  7873  canthwdom  8242