Theorem lfuhgr 32364

Description: A hypergraph is loop-free if and only if every edge connects at least two vertices. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Oct-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lfuhgr.1	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
lfuhgr.2	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lfuhgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐺   𝑥,𝑉

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐼(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem lfuhgr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		edgval 26834	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
2		lfuhgr.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
3	2	rneqi 5807	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐼 = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
4	1, 3	eqtr4i 2847	. . . 4 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran 𝐼
5	4	sseq1i 3995	. . 3 ⊢ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
6	2	uhgrfun 26851	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → Fun 𝐼)
7		fdmrn 6538	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fun 𝐼 ↔ 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶ran 𝐼)
8		fss 6527	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶ran 𝐼 ∧ ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}) → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
9	8	ex 415	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶ran 𝐼 → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
10	7, 9	sylbi 219	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Fun 𝐼 → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
11	6, 10	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
12		frn 6520	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} → ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
13	11, 12	impbid1 227	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (ran 𝐼 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
14	5, 13	syl5bb 285	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ 𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)}))
15		uhgredgss 26916	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}))
16	15	difss2d 4111	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺))
17		lfuhgr.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
18	17	pweqi 4557	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝒫 𝑉 = 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺)
19	16, 18	sseqtrrdi 4018	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)
20		ssrab 4049	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))
21	20	baib 538	. . 3 ⊢ ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉 → ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))
22	19, 21	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → ((Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))
23	14, 22	bitr3d 283	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3138  {crab 3142   ⊆ wss 3936  ∅c0 4291  𝒫 cpw 4539  {csn 4567   class class class wbr 5066  dom cdm 5555  ran crn 5556  Fun wfun 6349  ⟶wf 6351  ‘cfv 6355   ≤ cle 10676  2c2 11693  ♯chash 13691  Vtxcvtx 26781  iEdgciedg 26782  Edgcedg 26832  UHGraphcuhgr 26841

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5203  ax-nul 5210  ax-pow 5266  ax-pr 5330  ax-un 7461

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3773  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-pw 4541  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4839  df-br 5067  df-opab 5129  df-mpt 5147  df-id 5460  df-xp 5561  df-rel 5562  df-cnv 5563  df-co 5564  df-dm 5565  df-rn 5566  df-iota 6314  df-fun 6357  df-fn 6358  df-f 6359  df-fv 6363  df-edg 26833  df-uhgr 26843

This theorem is referenced by:  lfuhgr2  32365