Theorem sate0 32683

Description: The simplified satisfaction predicate for any wff code over an empty model. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.) (Revised by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sate0	⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Proof of Theorem sate0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5204	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2		satefv 32682	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
3	1, 2	mpan 688	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
4		xp0 6008	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∅ × ∅) = ∅
5	4	ineq2i 4179	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ( E ∩ ∅)
6		in0 4338	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ ∅) = ∅
7	5, 6	eqtri 2843	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ∅
8	7	oveq2i 7160	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅))) = (∅ Sat ∅)
9	8	fveq1i 6664	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω) = ((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)
10	9	fveq1i 6664	. 2 ⊢ (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)
11	3, 10	syl6eq 2871	1 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1536   ∈ wcel 2113  Vcvv 3491   ∩ cin 3928  ∅c0 4284   E cep 5457   × cxp 5546  ‘cfv 6348  (class class class)co 7149  ωcom 7573   Sat csat 32604   Sat_∈ csate 32606

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2792  ax-sep 5196  ax-nul 5203  ax-pr 5323

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1084  df-tru 1539  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2621  df-eu 2653  df-clab 2799  df-cleq 2813  df-clel 2892  df-nfc 2962  df-ral 3142  df-rex 3143  df-rab 3146  df-v 3493  df-sbc 3769  df-dif 3932  df-un 3934  df-in 3936  df-ss 3945  df-nul 4285  df-if 4461  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563  df-op 4567  df-uni 4832  df-br 5060  df-opab 5122  df-id 5453  df-xp 5554  df-rel 5555  df-cnv 5556  df-co 5557  df-dm 5558  df-iota 6307  df-fun 6350  df-fv 6356  df-ov 7152  df-oprab 7153  df-mpo 7154  df-sate 32612

This theorem is referenced by:  prv0  32698