Theorem prv0 32677

Description: Every wff encoded as 𝑈 is true in an "empty model" (𝑀 = ∅). Since ⊧ is defined in terms of the interpretations making the given formula true, it is not defined on the "empty model", since there are no interpretations. In particular, the empty set on the LHS of ⊧ should not be interpreted as the empty model, because ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑥 is not satisfied on the empty model. (Contributed by AV, 19-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
prv0	⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∅⊧𝑈)

Proof of Theorem prv0

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sate0 32662	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
2		peano1 7601	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ∅ ∈ ω
3	2	n0ii 4302	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ ω = ∅
4	3	intnan 489	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ω = ∅)
5	4	a1i 11	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ω = ∅))
6		f00 6561	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥:ω⟶∅ ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∧ ω = ∅))
7	5, 6	sylnibr 331	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ¬ 𝑥:ω⟶∅)
8		0ex 5211	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
9	8, 8	pm3.2i 473	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)
10		satfvel 32659	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)) → 𝑥:ω⟶∅)
11	9, 10	mp3an1 1444	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)) → 𝑥:ω⟶∅)
12	7, 11	mtand 814	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
13	12	alrimiv 1928	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
14		eq0 4308	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))
15	13, 14	sylibr 236	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈) = ∅)
16	1, 15	eqtrd 2856	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = ∅)
17		prv 32675	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω)) → (∅⊧𝑈 ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (∅ ↑m ω)))
18	8, 17	mpan 688	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅⊧𝑈 ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (∅ ↑m ω)))
19	2	ne0ii 4303	. . . . 5 ⊢ ω ≠ ∅
20		map0b 8447	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ω ≠ ∅ → (∅ ↑m ω) = ∅)
21	19, 20	mp1i 13	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅ ↑m ω) = ∅)
22	21	eqeq2d 2832	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ((∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (∅ ↑m ω) ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = ∅))
23	18, 22	bitrd 281	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → (∅⊧𝑈 ↔ (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = ∅))
24	16, 23	mpbird 259	1 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) → ∅⊧𝑈)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398  ∀wal 1535   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 3016  Vcvv 3494  ∅c0 4291   class class class wbr 5066  ⟶wf 6351  ‘cfv 6355  (class class class)co 7156  ωcom 7580   ↑_m cmap 8406   Sat csat 32583  Fmlacfmla 32584   Sat_∈ csate 32585  ⊧cprv 32586

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-rep 5190  ax-sep 5203  ax-nul 5210  ax-pow 5266  ax-pr 5330  ax-un 7461  ax-inf2 9104  ax-ac2 9885

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-nel 3124  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-reu 3145  df-rmo 3146  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3773  df-csb 3884  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-pss 3954  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-pw 4541  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-tp 4572  df-op 4574  df-uni 4839  df-int 4877  df-iun 4921  df-br 5067  df-opab 5129  df-mpt 5147  df-tr 5173  df-id 5460  df-eprel 5465  df-po 5474  df-so 5475  df-fr 5514  df-se 5515  df-we 5516  df-xp 5561  df-rel 5562  df-cnv 5563  df-co 5564  df-dm 5565  df-rn 5566  df-res 5567  df-ima 5568  df-pred 6148  df-ord 6194  df-on 6195  df-lim 6196  df-suc 6197  df-iota 6314  df-fun 6357  df-fn 6358  df-f 6359  df-f1 6360  df-fo 6361  df-f1o 6362  df-fv 6363  df-isom 6364  df-riota 7114  df-ov 7159  df-oprab 7160  df-mpo 7161  df-om 7581  df-1st 7689  df-2nd 7690  df-wrecs 7947  df-recs 8008  df-rdg 8046  df-1o 8102  df-2o 8103  df-er 8289  df-map 8408  df-en 8510  df-dom 8511  df-sdom 8512  df-card 9368  df-ac 9542  df-goel 32587  df-gona 32588  df-goal 32589  df-sat 32590  df-sate 32591  df-fmla 32592  df-prv 32593

This theorem is referenced by: (None)