Theorem xpider 8368

Description: A Cartesian square is an equivalence relation (in general, it is not a poset). (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpider	⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐴) Er 𝐴

Proof of Theorem xpider

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relxp 5573	. 2 ⊢ Rel (𝐴 × 𝐴)
2		dmxpid 5800	. 2 ⊢ dom (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴
3		cnvxp 6014	. . 3 ⊢ ◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) = (𝐴 × 𝐴)
4		xpidtr 5982	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
5		uneq1 4132	. . . 4 ⊢ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) = (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
6		unss2 4157	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
7		unidm 4128	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴)
8		eqtr 2841	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴))
9		sseq2 3993	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴) → ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
10	9	biimpd 231	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴) → ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
11	8, 10	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
12	7, 11	mpan2 689	. . . 4 ⊢ ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
13	5, 6, 12	syl2im 40	. . 3 ⊢ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) = (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
14	3, 4, 13	mp2 9	. 2 ⊢ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
15		df-er 8289	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) Er 𝐴 ↔ (Rel (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ dom (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴 ∧ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
16	1, 2, 14, 15	mpbir3an 1337	1 ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐴) Er 𝐴

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∪ cun 3934   ⊆ wss 3936   × cxp 5553  ^◡ccnv 5554  dom cdm 5555   ∘ ccom 5559  Rel wrel 5560   Er wer 8286

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5203  ax-nul 5210  ax-pr 5330

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-br 5067  df-opab 5129  df-xp 5561  df-rel 5562  df-cnv 5563  df-co 5564  df-dm 5565  df-er 8289

This theorem is referenced by:  riiner  8370  efglem  18842