Theorem pm3.2im 626

Description: In classical logic, this is just a restatement of pm3.2 138. In intuitionistic logic, it still holds, but is weaker than pm3.2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pm3.2im	|- ( ph -> ( ps -> -. ( ph -> -. ps ) ) )

Proof of Theorem pm3.2im

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm2.27 40	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ( ph -> -. ps ) -> -. ps ) )
2	1	con2d 613	1 |- ( ph -> ( ps -> -. ( ph -> -. ps ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-in1 603  ax-in2 604

This theorem is referenced by:  expi  627  jc  640  expt  646  imnan  679  dfandc  869