Theorem 3orim123d 1310

Description: Deduction joining 3 implications to form implication of disjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-1997.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
3anim123d.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3anim123d.2	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))
3anim123d.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3orim123d	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜁)))

Proof of Theorem 3orim123d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3anim123d.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
2		3anim123d.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))
3	1, 2	orim12d 776	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏)))
4		3anim123d.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))
5	3, 4	orim12d 776	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ 𝜂) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ∨ 𝜁)))
6		df-3or 969	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ 𝜂))
7		df-3or 969	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜁) ↔ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ∨ 𝜁))
8	5, 6, 7	3imtr4g 204	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜁)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 698   ∨ w3o 967

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3or 969

This theorem is referenced by:  ztri3or0  9233