Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 3bior2fd | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: A wff is equivalent to its threefold disjunction with double falsehood, analogous to biorf 934. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Sep-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3biorfd.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜃) |
3biorfd.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3bior2fd | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3biorfd.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) | |
2 | biorf 934 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜒 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) | |
3 | 1, 2 | syl 17 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) |
4 | 3biorfd.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜃) | |
5 | 4 | 3bior1fd 1474 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) |
6 | 3, 5 | bitrd 278 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∨ wo 844 ∨ w3o 1085 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-or 845 df-3or 1087 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |