| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 15 of 504) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31065) |
(31066-32588) |
(32589-50379) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | syl131anc 1401 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) | ||
| Theorem | syl311anc 1402 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) | ||
| Theorem | syl33anc 1403 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁)) → 𝜎) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) | ||
| Theorem | syl222anc 1404 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜁)) → 𝜎) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) | ||
| Theorem | syl123anc 1405 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁)) → 𝜎) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) | ||
| Theorem | syl132anc 1406 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜁)) → 𝜎) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) | ||
| Theorem | syl213anc 1407 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃 ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁)) → 𝜎) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) | ||
| Theorem | syl231anc 1408 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜎) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) | ||
| Theorem | syl312anc 1409 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏 ∧ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜁)) → 𝜎) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) | ||
| Theorem | syl321anc 1410 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜎) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) | ||
| Theorem | syl133anc 1411 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜁 ∧ 𝜎)) → 𝜌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜌) | ||
| Theorem | syl313anc 1412 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏 ∧ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜁 ∧ 𝜎)) → 𝜌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜌) | ||
| Theorem | syl331anc 1413 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜌) | ||
| Theorem | syl223anc 1414 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜁 ∧ 𝜎)) → 𝜌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜌) | ||
| Theorem | syl232anc 1415 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ (𝜁 ∧ 𝜎)) → 𝜌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜌) | ||
| Theorem | syl322anc 1416 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ (𝜁 ∧ 𝜎)) → 𝜌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜌) | ||
| Theorem | syl233anc 1417 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜌) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ (𝜁 ∧ 𝜎 ∧ 𝜌)) → 𝜇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜇) | ||
| Theorem | syl323anc 1418 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜌) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ (𝜁 ∧ 𝜎 ∧ 𝜌)) → 𝜇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜇) | ||
| Theorem | syl332anc 1419 | Syllogism combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜌) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) ∧ (𝜎 ∧ 𝜌)) → 𝜇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜇) | ||
| Theorem | syl333anc 1420 | A syllogism inference combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜎) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜇) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) ∧ (𝜎 ∧ 𝜌 ∧ 𝜇)) → 𝜆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜆) | ||
| Theorem | syl3an1b 1421 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | syl3an2b 1422 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | syl3an3b 1423 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | syl3an1br 1424 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | syl3an2br 1425 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | syl3an3br 1426 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜑) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | syld3an3 1427 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | syld3an1 1428 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜑) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | syld3an2 1429 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | syl3anl1 1430 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | syl3anl2 1431 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | syl3anl3 1432 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | syl3anl 1433 | A triple syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜎) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜎) | ||
| Theorem | syl3anr1 1434 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | syl3anr2 1435 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | syl3anr3 1436 | A syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | 3anidm12 1437 | Inference from idempotent law for conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | 3anidm13 1438 | Inference from idempotent law for conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | 3anidm23 1439 | Inference from idempotent law for conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | syl2an3an 1440 | syl3an 1172 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Aug-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | syl2an23an 1441 | Deduction related to syl3an 1172 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | 3ori 1442 | Infer implication from triple disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | 3jao 1443 | Disjunction of three antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 3jaob 1444 | Disjunction of three antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) (Proof shortened by Hongxiu Chen, 29-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) → 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | 3jaobOLD 1445 | Obsolete version of 3jaob 1444 as of 29-Jun-2025. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) → 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | 3jaoi 1446 | Disjunction of three antecedents (inference). (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Garrett Katz, 16-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | 3jaoiOLD 1447 | Obsolete version of 3jaoi 1446 as of 16-Jun-2026. Disjunction of three antecedents (inference). (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | 3jaod 1448 | Disjunction of three antecedents (deduction). (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜏) → 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | 3jaoian 1449 | Disjunction of three antecedents (inference). (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | 3jaodan 1450 | Disjunction of three antecedents (deduction). (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜏)) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | mpjao3dan 1451 | Eliminate a three-way disjunction in a deduction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Apr-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | 3jaao 1452 | Inference conjoining and disjoining the antecedents of three implications. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Garrett Katz, 16-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝜁 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜁) → 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | 3jaaoOLD 1453 | Obsolete version of 3jaao 1452 as of 16-Jun-2026. Inference conjoining and disjoining the antecedents of three implications. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝜁 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜁) → 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | syl3an9b 1454 | Nested syllogism inference conjoining 3 dissimilar antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜁)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜁)) | ||
| Theorem | 3orbi123d 1455 | Deduction joining 3 equivalences to form equivalence of disjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 20-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜁))) | ||
| Theorem | 3anbi123d 1456 | Deduction joining 3 equivalences to form equivalence of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) | ||
| Theorem | 3anbi12d 1457 | Deduction conjoining and adding a conjunct to equivalences. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | 3anbi13d 1458 | Deduction conjoining and adding a conjunct to equivalences. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂 ∧ 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | 3anbi23d 1459 | Deduction conjoining and adding a conjunct to equivalences. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜂 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | 3anbi1d 1460 | Deduction adding conjuncts to an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | 3anbi2d 1461 | Deduction adding conjuncts to an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | 3anbi3d 1462 | Deduction adding conjuncts to an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | 3anim123d 1463 | Deduction joining 3 implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) | ||
| Theorem | 3orim123d 1464 | Deduction joining 3 implications to form implication of disjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-1997.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜁))) | ||
| Theorem | an6 1465 | Rearrangement of 6 conjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-1995.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | 3an6 1466 | Analogue of an4 666 for triple conjunction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜂)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | 3or6 1467 | Analogue of or4 937 for triple conjunction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ (𝜏 ∨ 𝜂)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | mp3an1 1468 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mp3an2 1469 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mp3an3 1470 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mp3an12 1471 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mp3an13 1472 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mp3an23 1473 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mp3an1i 1474 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)) | ||
| Theorem | mp3anl1 1475 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | mp3anl2 1476 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | mp3anl3 1477 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | mp3anr1 1478 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2006.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | mp3anr2 1479 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2006.) |
| ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | mp3anr3 1480 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | mp3an 1481 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜃 | ||
| Theorem | mpd3an3 1482 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mpd3an23 1483 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mp3and 1484 | A deduction based on modus ponens. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | mp3an12i 1485 | mp3an 1481 with antecedents in standard conjunction form and with one hypothesis an implication. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Aug-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | mp3an2i 1486 | mp3an 1481 with antecedents in standard conjunction form and with two hypotheses which are implications. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Aug-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | mp3an3an 1487 | mp3an 1481 with antecedents in standard conjunction form and with two hypotheses which are implications. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Aug-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | mp3an2ani 1488 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | biimp3a 1489 | Infer implication from a logical equivalence. Similar to biimpa 480. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | biimp3ar 1490 | Infer implication from a logical equivalence. Similar to biimpar 481. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | 3anandis 1491 | Inference that undistributes a triple conjunction in the antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2007.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | 3anandirs 1492 | Inference that undistributes a triple conjunction in the antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | ecase23d 1493 | Deduction for elimination by cases. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | 3ecase 1494 | Inference for elimination by cases. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (¬ 𝜒 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜃 | ||
| Theorem | 3bior1fd 1495 | A disjunction is equivalent to a threefold disjunction with single falsehood, analogous to biorf 947. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | 3bior1fand 1496 | A disjunction is equivalent to a threefold disjunction with single falsehood of a conjunction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | 3bior2fd 1497 | A wff is equivalent to its threefold disjunction with double falsehood, analogous to biorf 947. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | 3biant1d 1498 | A conjunction is equivalent to a threefold conjunction with single truth, analogous to biantrud 539. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | intn3an1d 1499 | Introduction of a triple conjunct inside a contradiction. (Contributed by FL, 27-Dec-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | intn3an2d 1500 | Introduction of a triple conjunct inside a contradiction. (Contributed by FL, 27-Dec-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |