Theorem ax11w 2129

Description: Weak version of ax-11 2156 from which we can prove any ax-11 2156 instance not involving wff variables or bundling. Uses only Tarski's FOL axiom schemes. Unlike ax-11 2156, this theorem requires that 𝑥 and 𝑦 be distinct i.e. are not bundled. It is an alias of alcomimw 2041 introduced for labeling consistency. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2017.) Use alcomimw 2041 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ax11w.1	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax11w	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑦   𝜑,𝑧   𝜓,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ax11w

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax11w.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	alcomimw 2041	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206  ∀wal 1537

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1779

This theorem is referenced by: (None)