Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ax12w | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Weak version of ax-12 2175 from which we can prove any ax-12 2175 instance not involving wff variables or bundling. Uses only Tarski's FOL axiom schemes. An instance of the first hypothesis will normally require that 𝑥 and 𝑦 be distinct (unless 𝑥 does not occur in 𝜑). For an example of how the hypotheses can be eliminated when we substitute an expression without wff variables for 𝜑, see ax12wdemo 2135. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ax12w.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
ax12w.2 | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ax12w | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ax12w.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
2 | 1 | spw 2041 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜑) |
3 | ax12w.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
4 | 3 | ax12wlem 2132 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))) |
5 | 2, 4 | syl5 34 | 1 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∀wal 1540 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1802 ax-4 1816 ax-5 1917 ax-6 1975 ax-7 2015 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-ex 1787 |
This theorem is referenced by: ax12wdemo 2135 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |