| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ax12wdemo | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Example of an application of ax12w 2169 that results in an instance of ax-12 2212 for a contrived formula with mixed free and bound variables, (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦∀𝑧𝑦 ∈ 𝑥), in place of 𝜑. The proof illustrates bound variable renaming with cbvalvw 2068 to obtain fresh variables to avoid distinct variable clashes. Uses only Tarski's FOL axiom schemes. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-2017.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ax12wdemo | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦∀𝑧 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦∀𝑧 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | elequ1 2151 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)) | |
| 2 | elequ2 2159 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤)) | |
| 3 | 2 | cbvalvw 2068 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑤 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) |
| 4 | 3 | a1i 11 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑤 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤)) |
| 5 | elequ1 2151 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥)) | |
| 6 | 5 | albidv 1952 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → (∀𝑧 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥)) |
| 7 | 6 | cbvalvw 2068 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑧 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑣∀𝑧 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥) |
| 8 | elequ2 2159 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦)) | |
| 9 | 8 | albidv 1952 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦)) |
| 10 | 9 | albidv 1952 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑣∀𝑧 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑣∀𝑧 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦)) |
| 11 | 7, 10 | bitrid 286 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦∀𝑧 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑣∀𝑧 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦)) |
| 12 | 1, 4, 11 | 3anbi123d 1464 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦∀𝑧 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑤 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑣∀𝑧 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦))) |
| 13 | elequ2 2159 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑣)) | |
| 14 | 7 | a1i 11 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → (∀𝑦∀𝑧 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑣∀𝑧 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥)) |
| 15 | 13, 14 | 3anbi13d 1466 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦∀𝑧 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑣∀𝑧 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥))) |
| 16 | 12, 15 | ax12w 2169 | 1 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦∀𝑧 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦∀𝑧 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ w3a 1103 ∀wal 1567 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1827 ax-4 1841 ax-5 1942 ax-6 1999 ax-7 2040 ax-8 2146 ax-9 2154 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-3an 1105 df-ex 1812 |
| This theorem is used by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |