![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > spw | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Weak version of the specialization scheme sp 2181. Lemma 9 of [KalishMontague] p. 87. While it appears that sp 2181 in its general form does not follow from Tarski's FOL axiom schemes, from this theorem we can prove any instance of sp 2181 having mutually distinct setvar variables and no wff metavariables (see ax12wdemo 2133 for an example of the procedure to eliminate the hypothesis). Other approximations of sp 2181 are spfw 2030 (minimal distinct variable requirements), spnfw 1977 (when 𝑥 is not free in ¬ 𝜑), spvw 1978 (when 𝑥 does not appear in 𝜑), sptruw 1803 (when 𝜑 is true), spfalw 1995 (when 𝜑 is false), and spvv 1994 (where 𝜑 is changed into 𝜓). (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Feb-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
spw.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
spw | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ax-5 1908 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓) | |
2 | ax-5 1908 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑) | |
3 | ax-5 1908 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜑) | |
4 | spw.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
5 | 1, 2, 3, 4 | spfw 2030 | 1 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∀wal 1535 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1792 ax-4 1806 ax-5 1908 ax-6 1965 ax-7 2005 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-ex 1777 |
This theorem is referenced by: hba1w 2045 19.8aw 2048 exexw 2049 spaev 2050 ax12w 2131 rspw 3234 reldisj 4459 ralidmw 4514 dtruALT2 5376 dtruOLD 5452 bj-ssblem1 36637 bj-ax12w 36660 eu6w 42663 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |