| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > spw | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Weak version of the specialization scheme sp 2223. Lemma 9 of [KalishMontague] p. 87. While it appears that sp 2223 in its general form does not follow from Tarski's FOL axiom schemes, from this theorem we can prove any instance of sp 2223 having mutually distinct setvar variables and no wff metavariables (see ax12wdemo 2174 for an example of the procedure to eliminate the hypothesis). Other approximations of sp 2223 are spfw 2068 (minimal distinct variable requirements), spnfw 2014 (when 𝑥 is not free in ¬ 𝜑), spvw 2016 (when 𝑥 does not appear in 𝜑), sptruw 1839 (when 𝜑 is true), spfalw 2015 (when 𝜑 is false), and spvv 2023 (where 𝜑 is changed into 𝜓). (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Feb-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| spw.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| spw | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ax-5 1945 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓) | |
| 2 | ax-5 1945 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑) | |
| 3 | ax-5 1945 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜑) | |
| 4 | spw.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 5 | 1, 2, 3, 4 | spfw 2068 | 1 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∀wal 1568 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1945 ax-6 2002 ax-7 2043 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-ex 1813 |
| This theorem is used by: hba1w 2084 19.8aw 2087 exexw 2088 spaev 2089 ax12w 2172 rspw 3243 reldisj 4409 ralidmw 4475 dtruALT2 5339 bj-ssblem1 37768 bj-ax12w 37792 eu6w 43953 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |