Theorem dfvd2impr 44624

Description: A 2-antecedent nested implication implies its virtual deduction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfvd2impr	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   ))

Proof of Theorem dfvd2impr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfvd2 44599	. 2 ⊢ ((   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   ) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
2	1	biimpri 228	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   ))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  (   wvd2 44597

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-vd2 44598

This theorem is referenced by: (None)