P. 446 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44501-44600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	frege21 44501	Replace antecedent in antecedent. Proposition 21 of [Frege1879] p. 40. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜃) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege20 44502	A closed form of syl8 77. Proposition 20 of [Frege1879] p. 40. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → ((𝜃 → 𝜏) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))))
21.37.6.4  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II Implication and Negation
Theorem	axfrege28 44503	Contraposition. Identical to con3 154. Theorem *2.16 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 103. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
Axiom	ax-frege28 44504	Contraposition. Identical to con3 154. Theorem *2.16 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 103. Axiom 28 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege29 44505	Closed form of con3d 153. Proposition 29 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege30 44506	Commuted, closed form of con3d 153. Proposition 30 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜑)))
Theorem	axfrege31 44507	Identical to notnotr 131. Axiom 31 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege31 44508	𝜑 cannot be denied and (at the same time ) ¬ ¬ 𝜑 affirmed. Duplex negatio affirmat. The denial of the denial is affirmation. Identical to notnotr 131. Axiom 31 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege32 44509	Deduce con1 147 from con3 154. Proposition 32 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	frege33 44510	If 𝜑 or 𝜓 takes place, then 𝜓 or 𝜑 takes place. Identical to con1 147. Proposition 33 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege34 44511	If as a consequence of the occurrence of the circumstance 𝜑, when the obstacle 𝜓 is removed, 𝜒 takes place, then from the circumstance that 𝜒 does not take place while 𝜑 occurs the occurrence of the obstacle 𝜓 can be inferred. Closed form of con1d 146. Proposition 34 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege35 44512	Commuted, closed form of con1d 146. Proposition 35 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (¬ 𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege36 44513	The case in which 𝜓 is denied, ¬ 𝜑 is affirmed, and 𝜑 is affirmed does not occur. If 𝜑 occurs, then (at least) one of the two, 𝜑 or 𝜓, takes place (no matter what 𝜓 might be). Identical to pm2.24 125. Proposition 36 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege37 44514	If 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of the occurrence of 𝜓 or 𝜑, then 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of 𝜑 alone. Similar to a closed form of orcs 888. Proposition 37 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
Theorem	frege38 44515	Identical to pm2.21 124. Proposition 38 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege39 44516	Syllogism between pm2.18 129 and pm2.24 125. Proposition 39 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege40 44517	Anything implies pm2.18 129. Proposition 40 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	axfrege41 44518	Identical to notnot 143. Axiom 41 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege41 44519	The affirmation of 𝜑 denies the denial of 𝜑. Identical to notnot 143. Axiom 41 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege42 44520	Not not id 23. Proposition 42 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege43 44521	If there is a choice only between 𝜑 and 𝜑, then 𝜑 takes place. Identical to pm2.18 129. Proposition 43 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege44 44522	Similar to a commuted pm2.62 912. Proposition 44 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege45 44523	Deduce pm2.6 193 from con1 147. Proposition 45 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege46 44524	If 𝜓 holds when 𝜑 occurs as well as when 𝜑 does not occur, then 𝜓 holds. If 𝜓 or 𝜑 occurs and if the occurrences of 𝜑 has 𝜓 as a necessary consequence, then 𝜓 takes place. Identical to pm2.6 193. Proposition 46 of [Frege1879] p. 48. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege47 44525	Deduce consequence follows from either path implied by a disjunction. If 𝜑, as well as 𝜓 is sufficient condition for 𝜒 and 𝜓 or 𝜑 takes place, then the proposition 𝜒 holds. Proposition 47 of [Frege1879] p. 48. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege48 44526	Closed form of syllogism with internal disjunction. If 𝜑 is a sufficient condition for the occurrence of 𝜒 or 𝜓 and if 𝜒, as well as 𝜓, is a sufficient condition for 𝜃, then 𝜑 is a sufficient condition for 𝜃. See application in frege101 44638. Proposition 48 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege49 44527	Closed form of deduction with disjunction. Proposition 49 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege50 44528	Closed form of jaoi 870. Proposition 50 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege51 44529	Compare with jaod 872. Proposition 51 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜃) → 𝜒))))
21.37.6.5  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II with logical equivalence Here we leverage df-ifp 1077 to partition a wff into two that are disjoint with the selector wff. Thus if we are given ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) then we replace the concept (illegal in our notation ) (𝜑‘𝜓) with if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃) to reason about the values of the "function." Likewise, we replace the similarly illegal concept ∀𝜓𝜑 with (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃).
Theorem	axfrege52a 44530	Justification for ax-frege52a 44531. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Axiom	ax-frege52a 44531	The case when the content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜓 and in which a proposition controlled by an element for which we substitute the content of 𝜑 is affirmed (in this specific case the identity logical function) and the same proposition, this time where we substituted the content of 𝜓, is denied does not take place. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege52aid 44532	The case when the content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜓 and in which 𝜑 is affirmed and 𝜓 is denied does not take place. Identical to biimp 218. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege53aid 44533	Specialization of frege53a 44534. Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege53a 44534	Lemma for frege55a 44542. Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Theorem	axfrege54a 44535	Justification for ax-frege54a 44536. Identical to biid 264. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege54a 44536	Reflexive equality of wffs. The content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜑. Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Identical to biid 264. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege54cor0a 44537	Synonym for logical equivalence. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege54cor1a 44538	Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege55aid 44539	Lemma for frege57aid 44546. Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege55lem1a 44540	Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜏 → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)) → (𝜏 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)))
Theorem	frege55lem2a 44541	Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege55a 44542	Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege55cor1a 44543	Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege56aid 44544	Lemma for frege57aid 44546. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege56a 44545	Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃))) → ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege57aid 44546	This is the all important formula which allows to apply Frege-style definitions and explore their consequences. A closed form of biimpri 231. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege57a 44547	Analogue of frege57aid 44546. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃)))
Theorem	axfrege58a 44548	Identical to anifp 1086. Justification for ax-frege58a 44549. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Axiom	ax-frege58a 44549	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2100. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	frege58acor 44550	Lemma for frege59a 44551. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	frege59a 44551	A kind of Aristotelian inference. Namely Felapton or Fesapo. Proposition 59 of [Frege1879] p. 51. Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 44487 incorrectly referenced where frege30 44506 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) → ¬ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏))))
Theorem	frege60a 44552	Swap antecedents of ax-frege58a 44549. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜂) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege61a 44553	Lemma for frege65a 44557. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
Theorem	frege62a 44554	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2688 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	frege63a 44555	Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (𝜂 → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))))
Theorem	frege64a 44556	Lemma for frege65a 44557. Proposition 64 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜎, 𝜒, 𝜂)) → (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜎, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege65a 44557	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2688 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜏 → 𝜂)) → (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege66a 44558	Swap antecedents of frege65a 44557. Proposition 66 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜏 → 𝜂)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege67a 44559	Lemma for frege68a 44560. Proposition 67 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege68a 44560	Combination of applying a definition and applying it to a specific instance. Proposition 68 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)))
21.37.6.6  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II with equivalence of sets
Theorem	axfrege52c 44561	Justification for ax-frege52c 44562. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Axiom	ax-frege52c 44562	One side of dfsbcq 3745. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	frege52b 44563	The case when the content of 𝑥 is identical with the content of 𝑦 and in which a proposition controlled by an element for which we substitute the content of 𝑥 is affirmed and the same proposition, this time where we substitute the content of 𝑦, is denied does not take place. In [𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑, 𝑥 can also occur in other than the argument (𝑧) places. Hence 𝑥 may still be contained in [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑))
Theorem	frege53b 44564	Lemma for frege102 (via frege92 44629). Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	axfrege54c 44565	Reflexive equality of classes. Identical to eqid 2761. Justification for ax-frege54c 44566. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐴
Axiom	ax-frege54c 44566	Reflexive equality of sets (as classes). Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Identical to eqid 2761. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐴
Theorem	frege54b 44567	Reflexive equality of sets. The content of 𝑥 is identical with the content of 𝑥. Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Slightly specialized version of eqid 2761. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑥 = 𝑥
Theorem	frege54cor1b 44568	Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝑦 = 𝑥
Theorem	frege55lem1b 44569*	Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝑦 = 𝑧) → (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧))
Theorem	frege55lem2b 44570	Lemma for frege55b 44571. Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege55b 44571	Lemma for frege57b 44573. Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Note that eqtr2 2782 incorporates eqcom 2768 which is stronger than this proposition which is identical to equcomi 2045. Is it possible that Frege tricked himself into assuming what he was out to prove? (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege56b 44572	Lemma for frege57b 44573. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑)) → (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑)))
Theorem	frege57b 44573	Analogue of frege57aid 44546. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑))
Theorem	axfrege58b 44574	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2100. Justification for ax-frege58b 44575. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege58b 44575	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2100. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	frege58bid 44576	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, 𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to sp 2217. See ax-frege58b 44575 and frege58c 44595 for versions which more closely track the original. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege58bcor 44577	Lemma for frege59b 44578. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	frege59b 44578	A kind of Aristotelian inference. Namely Felapton or Fesapo. Proposition 59 of [Frege1879] p. 51. Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 44487 incorrectly referenced where frege30 44506 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege60b 44579	Swap antecedents of ax-frege58b 44575. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege61b 44580	Lemma for frege65b 44584. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege62b 44581	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2688 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	frege63b 44582	Lemma for frege91 44628. Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝜓 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜒) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege64b 44583	Lemma for frege65b 44584. Proposition 64 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓) → (∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege65b 44584	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2688 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53. In Frege care is taken to point out that the variables in the first clauses are independent of each other and of the final term so another valid translation could be : ⊢ (∀𝑥([𝑥 / 𝑎]𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓) → (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑏]𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑐]𝜒) → ([𝑧 / 𝑎]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑐]𝜒))). But that is perhaps too pedantic a translation for this exploration. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege66b 44585	Swap antecedents of frege65b 44584. Proposition 66 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜒 → 𝜑) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
Theorem	frege67b 44586	Lemma for frege68b 44587. Proposition 67 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) → ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
Theorem	frege68b 44587	Combination of applying a definition and applying it to a specific instance. Proposition 68 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
21.37.6.7  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II with equivalence of classes Begriffsschrift Chapter II with equivalence of classes (where they are sets).
Theorem	frege53c 44588	Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	frege54cor1c 44589*	Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Revised by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐴
Theorem	frege55lem1c 44590*	Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege55lem2c 44591*	Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → [𝐴 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege55c 44592	Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege56c 44593*	Lemma for frege57c 44594. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → (𝐵 = 𝐴 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
Theorem	frege57c 44594*	Swap order of implication in ax-frege52c 44562. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	frege58c 44595	Principle related to sp 2217. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	frege59c 44596	A kind of Aristotelian inference. Proposition 59 of [Frege1879] p. 51. Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 44487 incorrectly referenced where frege30 44506 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (¬ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege60c 44597	Swap antecedents of frege58c 44595. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege61c 44598	Lemma for frege65c 44602. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege62c 44599	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2688 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	frege63c 44600	Analogue of frege63b 44582. Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝜓 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜒) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))