Theorem eximp-surprise2 48330

Description: Show that "there exists" with an implication is always true if there exists a situation where the antecedent is false.

Those inexperienced with formal notations of classical logic may use expressions combining "there exists" with implication. This is usually a mistake, because that combination does not mean what an inexperienced person might think it means. For example, if there is some object that does not meet the precondition 𝜑, then the expression ∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) as a whole is always true, no matter what 𝜓 is (𝜓 could even be false, ⊥). New users of formal notation who use "there exists" with an implication should consider if they meant "and" instead of "implies". See eximp-surprise 48329, which shows what implication really expands to. See also empty-surprise 48327. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 18-Oct-2018.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
eximp-surprise2.1	⊢ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eximp-surprise2	⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem eximp-surprise2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eximp-surprise2.1	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑
2		orc 865	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
3	1, 2	eximii 1831	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥(¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)
4		eximp-surprise 48329	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
5	3, 4	mpbir 230	1 ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∨ wo 845  ∃wex 1773

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-or 846  df-ex 1774

This theorem is referenced by: (None)