New Foundations Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > NFE Home > Th. List > elimel | GIF version |
Description: Eliminate a membership hypothesis for weak deduction theorem, when special case B ∈ C is provable. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elimel.1 | ⊢ B ∈ C |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elimel | ⊢ if(A ∈ C, A, B) ∈ C |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eleq1 2413 | . 2 ⊢ (A = if(A ∈ C, A, B) → (A ∈ C ↔ if(A ∈ C, A, B) ∈ C)) | |
2 | eleq1 2413 | . 2 ⊢ (B = if(A ∈ C, A, B) → (B ∈ C ↔ if(A ∈ C, A, B) ∈ C)) | |
3 | elimel.1 | . 2 ⊢ B ∈ C | |
4 | 1, 2, 3 | elimhyp 3711 | 1 ⊢ if(A ∈ C, A, B) ∈ C |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ∈ wcel 1710 ifcif 3663 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1546 ax-5 1557 ax-17 1616 ax-9 1654 ax-8 1675 ax-6 1729 ax-7 1734 ax-11 1746 ax-12 1925 ax-ext 2334 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 177 df-or 359 df-an 360 df-tru 1319 df-ex 1542 df-nf 1545 df-sb 1649 df-clab 2340 df-cleq 2346 df-clel 2349 df-if 3664 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |