Theorem xmetunirn 12527

Description: Two ways to express an extended metric on an unspecified base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xmetunirn	⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))

Proof of Theorem xmetunirn

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 𝑑 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fnmap 6549	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ↑𝑚 Fn (V × V)
2		xrex 9639	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ℝ* ∈ V
3		sqxpexg 4655	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → (𝑥 × 𝑥) ∈ V)
4	3	elv 2690	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 × 𝑥) ∈ V
5		fnovex 5804	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( ↑𝑚 Fn (V × V) ∧ ℝ* ∈ V ∧ (𝑥 × 𝑥) ∈ V) → (ℝ* ↑𝑚 (𝑥 × 𝑥)) ∈ V)
6	1, 2, 4, 5	mp3an 1315	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ℝ* ↑𝑚 (𝑥 × 𝑥)) ∈ V
7	6	rabex 4072	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑𝑚 (𝑥 × 𝑥)) ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (((𝑦𝑑𝑧) = 0 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦𝑑𝑧) ≤ ((𝑤𝑑𝑦) +𝑒 (𝑤𝑑𝑧)))} ∈ V
8		df-xmet 12157	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∞Met = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑑 ∈ (ℝ* ↑𝑚 (𝑥 × 𝑥)) ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (((𝑦𝑑𝑧) = 0 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑦𝑑𝑧) ≤ ((𝑤𝑑𝑦) +𝑒 (𝑤𝑑𝑧)))})
9	7, 8	fnmpti 5251	. . . 4 ⊢ ∞Met Fn V
10		fnunirn 5668	. . . 4 ⊢ (∞Met Fn V → (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥)))
11	9, 10	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥))
12		id 19	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥))
13		xmetdmdm 12525	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → 𝑥 = dom dom 𝐷)
14	13	fveq2d 5425	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → (∞Met‘𝑥) = (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))
15	12, 14	eleqtrd 2218	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))
16	15	rexlimivw 2545	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑥) → 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))
17	11, 16	sylbi 120	. 2 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met → 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))
18		elex 2697	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → 𝐷 ∈ V)
19		dmexg 4803	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ V → dom 𝐷 ∈ V)
20		dmexg 4803	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom 𝐷 ∈ V → dom dom 𝐷 ∈ V)
21	18, 19, 20	3syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → dom dom 𝐷 ∈ V)
22		fvssunirng 5436	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom dom 𝐷 ∈ V → (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) ⊆ ∪ ran ∞Met)
23	21, 22	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) ⊆ ∪ ran ∞Met)
24	23	sseld 3096	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → 𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met))
25	24	pm2.43i 49	. 2 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷) → 𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met)
26	17, 25	impbii 125	1 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ ∪ ran ∞Met ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘dom dom 𝐷))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1331   ∈ wcel 1480  ∀wral 2416  ∃wrex 2417  {crab 2420  Vcvv 2686   ⊆ wss 3071  ∪ cuni 3736   class class class wbr 3929   × cxp 4537  dom cdm 4539  ran crn 4540   Fn wfn 5118  ‘cfv 5123  (class class class)co 5774   ↑_𝑚 cmap 6542  0cc0 7620  ℝ^*cxr 7799   ≤ cle 7801   +_𝑒 cxad 9557  ∞Metcxmet 12149

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 603  ax-in2 604  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-13 1491  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121  ax-sep 4046  ax-pow 4098  ax-pr 4131  ax-un 4355  ax-setind 4452  ax-cnex 7711  ax-resscn 7712

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-fal 1337  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2002  df-mo 2003  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-ne 2309  df-ral 2421  df-rex 2422  df-rab 2425  df-v 2688  df-sbc 2910  df-csb 3004  df-dif 3073  df-un 3075  df-in 3077  df-ss 3084  df-pw 3512  df-sn 3533  df-pr 3534  df-op 3536  df-uni 3737  df-iun 3815  df-br 3930  df-opab 3990  df-mpt 3991  df-id 4215  df-xp 4545  df-rel 4546  df-cnv 4547  df-co 4548  df-dm 4549  df-rn 4550  df-res 4551  df-ima 4552  df-iota 5088  df-fun 5125  df-fn 5126  df-f 5127  df-fv 5131  df-ov 5777  df-oprab 5778  df-mpo 5779  df-1st 6038  df-2nd 6039  df-map 6544  df-pnf 7802  df-mnf 7803  df-xr 7804  df-xmet 12157

This theorem is referenced by:  isxms2  12621