Theorem dfeldisj5 35988

Description: Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfeldisj5	⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))

Distinct variable group:   𝑢,𝐴,𝑣

Proof of Theorem dfeldisj5

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfeldisj4 35987	. 2 ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
2		inecmo2 35644	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ∧ Rel ◡ E ) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ∧ Rel ◡ E ))
3		relcnv 5960	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel ◡ E
4	3	biantru 532	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ∧ Rel ◡ E ))
5	3	biantru 532	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ∧ Rel ◡ E ))
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr4i 305	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥)
7		eccnvep 35573	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V → [𝑢]◡ E = 𝑢)
8	7	elv 3496	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ [𝑢]◡ E = 𝑢
9		eccnvep 35573	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑣 ∈ V → [𝑣]◡ E = 𝑣)
10	9	elv 3496	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ [𝑣]◡ E = 𝑣
11	8, 10	ineq12i 4180	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣)
12	11	eqeq1i 2825	. . . . 5 ⊢ (([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅ ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅)
13	12	orbi2i 909	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ↔ (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))
14	13	2ralbii 3165	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))
15		brcnvep 35560	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V → (𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢))
16	15	elv 3496	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
17	16	rmobii 3395	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ ∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
18	17	albii 1819	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
19	6, 14, 18	3bitr3i 303	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
20	1, 19	bitr4i 280	1 ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   ∨ wo 843  ∀wal 1534   = wceq 1536  ∀wral 3137  ∃*wrmo 3140  Vcvv 3491   ∩ cin 3928  ∅c0 4284   class class class wbr 5059   E cep 5457  ^◡ccnv 5547  Rel wrel 5553  [cec 8280   ElDisj weldisj 35523

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2792  ax-sep 5196  ax-nul 5203  ax-pr 5323

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1084  df-tru 1539  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2621  df-eu 2653  df-clab 2799  df-cleq 2813  df-clel 2892  df-nfc 2962  df-ne 3016  df-ral 3142  df-rex 3143  df-rmo 3145  df-rab 3146  df-v 3493  df-sbc 3769  df-dif 3932  df-un 3934  df-in 3936  df-ss 3945  df-nul 4285  df-if 4461  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563  df-op 4567  df-br 5060  df-opab 5122  df-id 5453  df-eprel 5458  df-xp 5554  df-rel 5555  df-cnv 5556  df-co 5557  df-dm 5558  df-rn 5559  df-res 5560  df-ima 5561  df-ec 8284  df-coss 35693  df-cnvrefrel 35799  df-disjALTV 35972  df-eldisj 35974

This theorem is referenced by: (None)