Theorem dtruALT 4821

Description: Alternate proof of dtru 4778 which requires more axioms but is shorter and may be easier to understand.

Assuming that ZF set theory is consistent, we cannot prove this theorem unless we specify that 𝑥 and 𝑦 be distinct. Specifically, theorem spcev 3272 requires that 𝑥 must not occur in the subexpression ¬ 𝑦 = {∅} in step 4 nor in the subexpression ¬ 𝑦 = ∅ in step 9. The proof verifier will require that 𝑥 and 𝑦 be in a distinct variable group to ensure this. You can check this by deleting the $d statement in set.mm and rerunning the verifier, which will print a detailed explanation of the distinct variable violation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dtruALT	⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dtruALT

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0inp0 4758	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → ¬ 𝑦 = {∅})
2		p0ex 4774	. . . . 5 ⊢ {∅} ∈ V
3		eqeq2 2620	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = {∅} → (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 = {∅}))
4	3	notbid 306	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = {∅} → (¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = {∅}))
5	2, 4	spcev 3272	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑦 = {∅} → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥)
6	1, 5	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥)
7		0ex 4713	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
8		eqeq2 2620	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 = ∅))
9	8	notbid 306	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = ∅))
10	7, 9	spcev 3272	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑦 = ∅ → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥)
11	6, 10	pm2.61i 174	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥
12		exnal 1743	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥)
13		eqcom 2616	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
14	13	albii 1736	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
15	12, 14	xchbinx 322	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
16	11, 15	mpbi 218	1 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  ∀wal 1472   = wceq 1474  ∃wex 1694  ∅c0 3873  {csn 4124

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1712  ax-4 1727  ax-5 1826  ax-6 1874  ax-7 1921  ax-9 1985  ax-10 2005  ax-11 2020  ax-12 2033  ax-13 2233  ax-ext 2589  ax-sep 4703  ax-nul 4712  ax-pow 4764

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 195  df-or 383  df-an 384  df-tru 1477  df-ex 1695  df-nf 1700  df-sb 1867  df-clab 2596  df-cleq 2602  df-clel 2605  df-nfc 2739  df-ne 2781  df-v 3174  df-dif 3542  df-in 3546  df-ss 3553  df-nul 3874  df-pw 4109  df-sn 4125

This theorem is referenced by: (None)