fparlem1 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > fparlem1		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem fparlem1 7807

Description: Lemma for fpar 7811. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
fparlem1	⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Proof of Theorem fparlem1 Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvres 6689	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = (1^st ‘𝑦))
2	1	eqeq1d 2823	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
3		vex 3497	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
4	3	elsn2 4604	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥)
5		fvex 6683	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V
6	5	biantru 532	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
7	4, 6	bitr3i 279	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
8	2, 7	syl6bb 289	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
9	8	pm5.32i 577	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
10		f1stres 7713	. . . 4 ⊢ (1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V
11		ffn 6514	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V → (1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V))
12		fniniseg 6830	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V) → (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥)))
13	10, 11, 12	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
14		elxp7 7724	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
15	9, 13, 14	3bitr4i 305	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V))
16	15	eqriv 2818	1 ⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 398 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2114 Vcvv 3494 {csn 4567 × cxp 5553 ^◡ccnv 5554 ↾ cres 5557 “ cima 5558 Fn wfn 6350 ⟶wf 6351 ‘cfv 6355 1^st c1st 7687 2^nd c2nd 7688

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2145 ax-11 2161 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2793 ax-sep 5203 ax-nul 5210 ax-pow 5266 ax-pr 5330 ax-un 7461

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-3an 1085 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2622 df-eu 2654 df-clab 2800 df-cleq 2814 df-clel 2893 df-nfc 2963 df-ne 3017 df-ral 3143 df-rex 3144 df-rab 3147 df-v 3496 df-sbc 3773 df-csb 3884 df-dif 3939 df-un 3941 df-in 3943 df-ss 3952 df-nul 4292 df-if 4468 df-sn 4568 df-pr 4570 df-op 4574 df-uni 4839 df-iun 4921 df-br 5067 df-opab 5129 df-mpt 5147 df-id 5460 df-xp 5561 df-rel 5562 df-cnv 5563 df-co 5564 df-dm 5565 df-rn 5566 df-res 5567 df-ima 5568 df-iota 6314 df-fun 6357 df-fn 6358 df-f 6359 df-fv 6363 df-1st 7689 df-2nd 7690

This theorem is referenced by: fparlem3 7809

W3C validator