Theorem lnrot2 26396

Description: Rotating the points defining a line. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
btwnlng1.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
btwnlng1.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
btwnlng1.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
btwnlng1.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
btwnlng1.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
btwnlng1.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
btwnlng1.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
btwnlng1.d	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
lnrot2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍))
lnrot2.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lnrot2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))

Proof of Theorem lnrot2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lnrot2.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍))
2		btwnlng1.p	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
3		eqid 2821	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dist‘𝐺) = (dist‘𝐺)
4		btwnlng1.i	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
5		btwnlng1.g	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6		btwnlng1.y	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
7		btwnlng1.x	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
8		btwnlng1.z	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
9	2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8	tgbtwncomb 26261	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)))
10		biidd 264	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
11	2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 7	tgbtwncomb 26261	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)))
12	9, 10, 11	3orbi123d 1431	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋)) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))))
13		3orrot 1088	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)))
14	12, 13	syl6bbr 291	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
15		btwnlng1.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
16		lnrot2.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)
17	2, 15, 4, 5, 6, 8, 16, 7	tgellng 26325	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋))))
18		btwnlng1.d	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
19	2, 15, 4, 5, 7, 6, 18, 8	tgellng 26325	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
20	14, 17, 19	3bitr4d 313	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)))
21	1, 20	mpbid 234	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ w3o 1082   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 3016  ‘cfv 6341  (class class class)co 7142  Basecbs 16466  distcds 16557  TarskiGcstrkg 26202  Itvcitv 26208  LineGclng 26209

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5189  ax-nul 5196  ax-pr 5316

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3488  df-sbc 3764  df-dif 3927  df-un 3929  df-in 3931  df-ss 3940  df-nul 4280  df-if 4454  df-pw 4527  df-sn 4554  df-pr 4556  df-op 4560  df-uni 4825  df-br 5053  df-opab 5115  df-id 5446  df-xp 5547  df-rel 5548  df-cnv 5549  df-co 5550  df-dm 5551  df-iota 6300  df-fun 6343  df-fv 6349  df-ov 7145  df-oprab 7146  df-mpo 7147  df-trkgc 26220  df-trkgb 26221  df-trkgcb 26222  df-trkg 26225

This theorem is referenced by:  coltr  26419  mideulem2  26506