Theorem tgbtwnswapid 26276

Description: If you can swap the first two arguments of a betweenness statement, then those arguments are identical. Theorem 3.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 30. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Mar-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tkgeom.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tkgeom.d	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
tkgeom.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
tkgeom.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
tgbtwnswapid.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
tgbtwnswapid.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
tgbtwnswapid.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)
tgbtwnswapid.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶))
tgbtwnswapid.5	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tgbtwnswapid	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem tgbtwnswapid

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tkgeom.p	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		tkgeom.d	. . . 4 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
3		tkgeom.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
4		tkgeom.g	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
5	4	ad2antrr 724	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6		tgbtwnswapid.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
7	6	ad2antrr 724	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
8		simplr 767	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃)
9		simprl 769	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴))
10	1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9	axtgbtwnid 26250	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝐴 = 𝑥)
11		tgbtwnswapid.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
12	11	ad2antrr 724	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
13		simprr 771	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))
14	1, 2, 3, 5, 12, 8, 13	axtgbtwnid 26250	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝐵 = 𝑥)
15	10, 14	eqtr4d 2858	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵))) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
16		tgbtwnswapid.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)
17		tgbtwnswapid.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶))
18		tgbtwnswapid.5	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))
19	1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 6, 16, 6, 11, 17, 18	axtgpasch 26251	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐵)))
20	15, 19	r19.29a 3288	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1536   ∈ wcel 2113  ‘cfv 6348  (class class class)co 7149  Basecbs 16478  distcds 16569  TarskiGcstrkg 26214  Itvcitv 26220

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2792  ax-nul 5203

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1084  df-tru 1539  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2621  df-eu 2653  df-clab 2799  df-cleq 2813  df-clel 2892  df-nfc 2962  df-ral 3142  df-rex 3143  df-rab 3146  df-v 3493  df-sbc 3769  df-dif 3932  df-un 3934  df-in 3936  df-ss 3945  df-nul 4285  df-if 4461  df-pw 4534  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563  df-op 4567  df-uni 4832  df-br 5060  df-iota 6307  df-fv 6356  df-ov 7152  df-trkgb 26233  df-trkg 26237

This theorem is referenced by:  legtri3  26374