Theorem con2biddc 880

Description: A contraposition deduction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Apr-2018.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
con2biddc.1	|- ( ph -> (DECID ch -> ( ps <-> -. ch ) ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
con2biddc	|- ( ph -> (DECID ch -> ( ch <-> -. ps ) ) )

Proof of Theorem con2biddc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		con2biddc.1	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> (DECID ch -> ( ps <-> -. ch ) ) )
2		bicom 140	. . . 4 |- ( ( ps <-> -. ch ) <-> ( -. ch <-> ps ) )
3	1, 2	imbitrdi 161	. . 3 |- ( ph -> (DECID ch -> ( -. ch <-> ps ) ) )
4	3	con1biddc 876	. 2 |- ( ph -> (DECID ch -> ( -. ps <-> ch ) ) )
5		bicom 140	. 2 |- ( ( -. ps <-> ch ) <-> ( ch <-> -. ps ) )
6	4, 5	imbitrdi 161	1 |- ( ph -> (DECID ch -> ( ch <-> -. ps ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105  DECID wdc 834

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 614  ax-in2 615  ax-io 709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-stab 831  df-dc 835

This theorem is referenced by:  anordc  956  xor3dc  1387