Theorem exlimd2 1531

Description: Deduction from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. Similar to exlimdh 1532 but with one slightly different hypothesis. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
exlimd2.1	|- ( ph -> A. x ph )
exlimd2.2	|- ( ph -> ( ch -> A. x ch ) )
exlimd2.3	|- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
exlimd2	|- ( ph -> ( E. x ps -> ch ) )

Proof of Theorem exlimd2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exlimd2.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. x ph )
2		exlimd2.2	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ch -> A. x ch ) )
3	1, 2	alrimih 1403	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x ( ch -> A. x ch ) )
4		exlimd2.3	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) )
5	1, 4	alrimih 1403	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x ( ps -> ch ) )
6		19.23ht 1431	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( ch -> A. x ch ) -> ( A. x ( ps -> ch ) <-> ( E. x ps -> ch ) ) )
7	6	biimpd 142	. 2 |- ( A. x ( ch -> A. x ch ) -> ( A. x ( ps -> ch ) -> ( E. x ps -> ch ) ) )
8	3, 5, 7	sylc 61	1 |- ( ph -> ( E. x ps -> ch ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   A.wal 1287   E.wex 1426

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-5 1381  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie2 1428

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115

This theorem is referenced by:  equsexd  1664  cbvexdh  1849