| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > spim | Unicode version | ||
| Description: Specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. The spim 1786 series of theorems requires that only one direction of the substitution hypothesis hold. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| spim.1 |
|
| spim.2 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| spim |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | spim.1 |
. . 3
| |
| 2 | 1 | nfri 1567 |
. 2
|
| 3 | spim.2 |
. 2
| |
| 4 | 2, 3 | spimh 1785 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-5 1495 ax-gen 1497 ax-ie1 1541 ax-ie2 1542 ax-4 1558 ax-i9 1578 ax-ial 1582 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-nf 1509 |
| This theorem is referenced by: cbv3 1790 chvar 1805 spimv 1859 2spim 16362 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |