Theorem spim 1752

Description: Specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. The spim 1752 series of theorems requires that only one direction of the substitution hypothesis hold. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
spim.1	|- F/ x ps
spim.2	|- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
spim	|- ( A. x ph -> ps )

Proof of Theorem spim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		spim.1	. . 3 |- F/ x ps
2	1	nfri 1533	. 2 |- ( ps -> A. x ps )
3		spim.2	. 2 |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )
4	2, 3	spimh 1751	1 |- ( A. x ph -> ps )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   A.wal 1362   F/wnf 1474

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1461  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-4 1524  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1475

This theorem is referenced by:  cbv3  1756  chvar  1771  spimv  1825  2spim  15412