Axiom ax-4 1503

Description: Axiom of Specialization. A quantified wff implies the wff without a quantifier (i.e. an instance, or special case, of the generalized wff). In other words if something is true for all x, it is true for any specific x (that would typically occur as a free variable in the wff substituted for ph). (A free variable is one that does not occur in the scope of a quantifier: x and y are both free in x = y, but only x is free in A. y x = y.) Axiom scheme C5' in [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint). Also appears as Axiom B5 of [Tarski] p. 67 (under his system S2, defined in the last paragraph on p. 77).

Note that the converse of this axiom does not hold in general, but a weaker inference form of the converse holds and is expressed as rule ax-gen 1442. Conditional forms of the converse are given by ax12 1505, ax-16 1807, and ax-17 1519.

Unlike the more general textbook Axiom of Specialization, we cannot choose a variable different from x for the special case. For use, that requires the assistance of equality axioms, and we deal with it later after we introduce the definition of proper substitution - see stdpc4 1768.

(Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax-4	|- ( A. x ph -> ph )

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wph	. . 3 wff ph
2		vx	. . 3 setvar x
3	1, 2	wal 1346	. 2 wff A. x ph
4	3, 1	wi 4	1 wff ( A. x ph -> ph )

This axiom is referenced by:  sp  1504  ax12  1505  hbequid  1506  spi  1529  hbim  1538  19.3h  1546  19.21h  1550  19.21bi  1551  hbimd  1566  19.21ht  1574  hbnt  1646  19.12  1658  19.38  1669  ax9o  1691  hbae  1711  equveli  1752  sb2  1760  drex1  1791  ax11b  1819  a16gb  1858  sb56  1878  sb6  1879  sbalyz  1992  hbsb4t  2006  moim  2083  mopick  2097