Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > 3ad2antr3 | GIF version |
Description: Deduction adding a conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2007.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3ad2antl.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3ad2antr3 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3ad2antl.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | |
2 | 1 | adantrl 470 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) |
3 | 2 | 3adantr1 1146 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ∧ w3a 968 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 970 |
This theorem is referenced by: ordwe 4553 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |