Theorem 3adantll3 41321

Description: Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3adantll3.1	⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3adantll3	⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Proof of Theorem 3adantll3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpll1 1208	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜑)
2		simpll2 1209	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓)
3	1, 2	jca 514	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
4		simplr 767	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒)
5		simpr 487	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜃)
6		3adantll3.1	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
7	3, 4, 5, 6	syl21anc 835	1 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   ∧ w3a 1083

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-3an 1085

This theorem is referenced by:  fourierdlem42  42454  fourierdlem49  42460