Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 445 of 464) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29181) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29182-30704) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30705-46395) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | adh-minimp-imim1 44401 | Derivation of imim1 83 ("left antimonotonicity of implication", theorem *2.06 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 100) from adh-minimp 44395 and ax-mp 5. Polish prefix notation: CCpqCCqrCpr . (Contributed by ADH, 10-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | adh-minimp-ax2c 44402 | Derivation of a commuted form of ax-2 7 from adh-minimp 44395 and ax-mp 5. Polish prefix notation: CCpqCCpCqrCpr . (Contributed by BJ, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by ADH, 10-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | adh-minimp-ax2-lem4 44403 | Fourth lemma for the derivation of ax-2 7 from adh-minimp 44395 and ax-mp 5. Polish prefix notation: CpCCqCprCqr . (Contributed by ADH, 10-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | adh-minimp-ax2 44404 | Derivation of ax-2 7 from adh-minimp 44395 and ax-mp 5. Polish prefix notation: CCpCqrCCpqCpr . (Contributed by BJ, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by ADH, 10-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | adh-minimp-idALT 44405 | Derivation of id 22 (reflexivity of implication, PM *2.08 WhiteheadRussell p. 101) from adh-minimp-ax1 44400, adh-minimp-ax2 44404, and ax-mp 5. It uses the derivation written DD211 in D-notation. (See head comment for an explanation.) Polish prefix notation: Cpp . (Contributed by ADH, 10-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | adh-minimp-pm2.43 44406 | Derivation of pm2.43 56 WhiteheadRussell p. 106 (also called "hilbert" or "W") from adh-minimp-ax1 44400, adh-minimp-ax2 44404, and ax-mp 5. It uses the derivation written DD22D21 in D-notation. (See head comment for an explanation.) Polish prefix notation: CCpCpqCpq . (Contributed by BJ, 31-May-2021.) (Revised by ADH, 10-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | eusnsn 44407* | There is a unique element of a singleton which is equal to another singleton. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ ∃!𝑥{𝑥} = {𝑦} | ||
Theorem | absnsb 44408* | If the class abstraction {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} associated with the wff 𝜑 is a singleton, the wff is true for the singleton element. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | euabsneu 44409* | Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff 𝜑: its associated class abstraction {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} is a singleton. Variant of euabsn2 4658 using existential uniqueness for the singleton element instead of existence only. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}) | ||
Theorem | elprneb 44410 | An element of a proper unordered pair is the first element iff it is not the second element. (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | oppr 44411 | Equality for ordered pairs implies equality of unordered pairs with the same elements. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 → {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷})) | ||
Theorem | opprb 44412 | Equality for unordered pairs corresponds to equality of unordered pairs with the same elements. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∨ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = 〈𝐷, 𝐶〉))) | ||
Theorem | or2expropbilem1 44413* | Lemma 1 for or2expropbi 44415 and ich2exprop 44811. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝑏) → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑏][𝑥 / 𝑎]𝜑)))) | ||
Theorem | or2expropbilem2 44414* | Lemma 2 for or2expropbi 44415 and ich2exprop 44811. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (∃𝑎∃𝑏(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑏][𝑥 / 𝑎]𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | or2expropbi 44415* | If two classes are strictly ordered, there is an ordered pair of both classes fulfilling a wff iff there is an unordered pair of both classes fulfilling the wff. (Contributed by AV, 26-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 Or 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵)) → (∃𝑎∃𝑏({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝑎, 𝑏} ∧ (𝑎𝑅𝑏 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑎∃𝑏(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∧ (𝑎𝑅𝑏 ∧ 𝜑)))) | ||
Theorem | eubrv 44416* | If there is a unique set which is related to a class, then the class must be a set. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑏 𝐴𝑅𝑏 → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | eubrdm 44417* | If there is a unique set which is related to a class, then the class is an element of the domain of the relation. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑏 𝐴𝑅𝑏 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | eldmressn 44418 | Element of the domain of a restriction to a singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) → 𝐵 = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | iota0def 44419* | Example for a defined iota being the empty set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 is a wff satisfied by a unique value 𝑥, namely 𝑥 = ∅ (the empty set is the one and only set which is a subset of every set). (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (℩𝑥∀𝑦 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | iota0ndef 44420* | Example for an undefined iota being the empty set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 is a wff not satisfied by a (unique) value 𝑥 (there is no set, and therefore certainly no unique set, which contains every set). (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (℩𝑥∀𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | fveqvfvv 44421 | If a function's value at an argument is the universal class (which can never be the case because of fvex 6769), the function's value at this argument is any set (especially the empty set). In short "If a function's value is a proper class, it is a set", which sounds strange/contradictory, but which is a consequence of that a contradiction implies anything (see pm2.21i 119). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | fnresfnco 44422 | Composition of two functions, similar to fnco 6533. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ (((𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺) Fn ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Fn 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | funcoressn 44423 | A composition restricted to a singleton is a function under certain conditions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ ((((𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {(𝐺‘𝑋)})) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) → Fun ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ↾ {𝑋})) | ||
Theorem | funressnfv 44424 | A restriction to a singleton with a function value is a function under certain conditions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jul-2017.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∧ Fun ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ↾ {𝑋})) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) → Fun (𝐹 ↾ {(𝐺‘𝑋)})) | ||
Theorem | funressndmfvrn 44425 | The value of a function 𝐹 at a set 𝐴 is in the range of the function 𝐹 if 𝐴 is in the domain of the function 𝐹. It is sufficient that 𝐹 is a function at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 1-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ ((Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | funressnvmo 44426* | A function restricted to a singleton has at most one value for the singleton element as argument. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ (Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝑥}) → ∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦) | ||
Theorem | funressnmo 44427* | A function restricted to a singleton has at most one value for the singleton element as argument. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})) → ∃*𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦) | ||
Theorem | funressneu 44428* | There is exactly one value of a class which is a function restricted to a singleton, analogous to funeu 6443. 𝐴 ∈ V is required because otherwise ∃!𝑦𝐴𝐹𝑦, see brprcneu 6747. (Contributed by AV, 7-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) ∧ 𝐴𝐹𝐵) → ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦) | ||
Theorem | fresfo 44429 | Conditions for a restriction to be an onto function. Part of fresf1o 30867. (Contributed by AV, 29-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ ran 𝐹) → (𝐹 ↾ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶)):(◡𝐹 “ 𝐶)–onto→𝐶) | ||
Theorem | fsetsniunop 44430* | The class of all functions from a (proper) singleton into 𝐵 is the union of all the singletons of (proper) ordered pairs over the elements of 𝐵 as second component. (Contributed by AV, 13-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:{𝑆}⟶𝐵} = ∪ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 {{〈𝑆, 𝑏〉}}) | ||
Theorem | fsetabsnop 44431* | The class of all functions from a (proper) singleton into 𝐵 is the class of all the singletons of (proper) ordered pairs over the elements of 𝐵 as second component. (Contributed by AV, 13-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:{𝑆}⟶𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = {〈𝑆, 𝑏〉}}) | ||
Theorem | fsetsnf 44432* | The mapping of an element of a class to a singleton function is a function. (Contributed by AV, 13-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = {〈𝑆, 𝑏〉}} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {〈𝑆, 𝑥〉}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐴) | ||
Theorem | fsetsnf1 44433* | The mapping of an element of a class to a singleton function is an injection. (Contributed by AV, 13-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = {〈𝑆, 𝑏〉}} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {〈𝑆, 𝑥〉}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐴) | ||
Theorem | fsetsnfo 44434* | The mapping of an element of a class to a singleton function is a surjection. (Contributed by AV, 13-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = {〈𝑆, 𝑏〉}} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {〈𝑆, 𝑥〉}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐴) | ||
Theorem | fsetsnf1o 44435* | The mapping of an element of a class to a singleton function is a bijection. (Contributed by AV, 13-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = {〈𝑆, 𝑏〉}} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {〈𝑆, 𝑥〉}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐴) | ||
Theorem | fsetsnprcnex 44436* | The class of all functions from a (proper) singleton into a proper class 𝐵 is not a set. (Contributed by AV, 13-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∉ V) → {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:{𝑆}⟶𝐵} ∉ V) | ||
Theorem | cfsetssfset 44437 | The class of constant functions is a subclass of the class of functions. (Contributed by AV, 13-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑧) = 𝑏)} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 ⊆ {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵} | ||
Theorem | cfsetsnfsetfv 44438* | The function value of the mapping of the class of singleton functions into the class of constant functions. (Contributed by AV, 13-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑧) = 𝑏)} & ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥:{𝑌}⟶𝐵} & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑔‘𝑌))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐺) → (𝐻‘𝑋) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑋‘𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | cfsetsnfsetf 44439* | The mapping of the class of singleton functions into the class of constant functions is a function. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑧) = 𝑏)} & ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥:{𝑌}⟶𝐵} & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑔‘𝑌))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐻:𝐺⟶𝐹) | ||
Theorem | cfsetsnfsetf1 44440* | The mapping of the class of singleton functions into the class of constant functions is an injection. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑧) = 𝑏)} & ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥:{𝑌}⟶𝐵} & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑔‘𝑌))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐻:𝐺–1-1→𝐹) | ||
Theorem | cfsetsnfsetfo 44441* | The mapping of the class of singleton functions into the class of constant functions is a surjection. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑧) = 𝑏)} & ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥:{𝑌}⟶𝐵} & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑔‘𝑌))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐻:𝐺–onto→𝐹) | ||
Theorem | cfsetsnfsetf1o 44442* | The mapping of the class of singleton functions into the class of constant functions is a bijection. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑧) = 𝑏)} & ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥:{𝑌}⟶𝐵} & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑔‘𝑌))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐻:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝐹) | ||
Theorem | fsetprcnexALT 44443* | First version of proof for fsetprcnex 8608, which was much more complicated. (Contributed by AV, 14-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ 𝐵 ∉ V) → {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵} ∉ V) | ||
Theorem | fcoreslem1 44444 | Lemma 1 for fcores 44448. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | fcoreslem2 44445 | Lemma 2 for fcores 44448. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝑋 = 𝐸) | ||
Theorem | fcoreslem3 44446 | Lemma 3 for fcores 44448. (Contributed by AV, 13-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋:𝑃–onto→𝐸) | ||
Theorem | fcoreslem4 44447 | Lemma 4 for fcores 44448. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∘ 𝑋) Fn 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | fcores 44448 | Every composite function (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) can be written as composition of restrictions of the composed functions (to their minimum domains). (Contributed by GL and AV, 17-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝑌 ∘ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | fcoresf1lem 44449 | Lemma for fcoresf1 44450. (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝐺 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑍) = (𝑌‘(𝑋‘𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | fcoresf1 44450 | If a composition is injective, then the restrictions of its components to the minimum domains are injective. (Contributed by GL and AV, 18-Sep-2024.) (Revised by AV, 7-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹):𝑃–1-1→𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋:𝑃–1-1→𝐸 ∧ 𝑌:𝐸–1-1→𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | fcoresf1b 44451 | A composition is injective iff the restrictions of its components to the minimum domains are injective. (Contributed by GL and AV, 7-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺 ∘ 𝐹):𝑃–1-1→𝐷 ↔ (𝑋:𝑃–1-1→𝐸 ∧ 𝑌:𝐸–1-1→𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | fcoresfo 44452 | If a composition is surjective, then the restriction of its first component to the minimum domain is surjective. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹):𝑃–onto→𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌:𝐸–onto→𝐷) | ||
Theorem | fcoresfob 44453 | A composition is surjective iff the restriction of its first component to the minimum domain is surjective. (Contributed by GL and AV, 7-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺 ∘ 𝐹):𝑃–onto→𝐷 ↔ 𝑌:𝐸–onto→𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | fcoresf1ob 44454 | A composition is bijective iff the restriction of its first component to the minimum domain is bijective and the restriction of its second component to the minimum domain is injective. (Contributed by GL and AV, 7-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺 ∘ 𝐹):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝐷 ↔ (𝑋:𝑃–1-1→𝐸 ∧ 𝑌:𝐸–1-1-onto→𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | f1cof1blem 44455 | Lemma for f1cof1b 44456 and focofob 44459. (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑃 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐶) ∧ (𝑋 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 = 𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | f1cof1b 44456 | If the range of 𝐹 equals the domain of 𝐺, then the composition (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) is injective iff 𝐹 and 𝐺 are both injective. (Contributed by GL and AV, 19-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐶) → ((𝐺 ∘ 𝐹):𝐴–1-1→𝐷 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐶–1-1→𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | funfocofob 44457 | If the domain of a function 𝐺 is a subset of the range of a function 𝐹, then the composition (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) is surjective iff 𝐺 is surjective. (Contributed by GL and AV, 29-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐹) → ((𝐺 ∘ 𝐹):(◡𝐹 “ 𝐴)–onto→𝐵 ↔ 𝐺:𝐴–onto→𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | fnfocofob 44458 | If the domain of a function 𝐺 equals the range of a function 𝐹, then the composition (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) is surjective iff 𝐺 is surjective. (Contributed by GL and AV, 29-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵) → ((𝐺 ∘ 𝐹):𝐴–onto→𝐶 ↔ 𝐺:𝐵–onto→𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | focofob 44459 | If the domain of a function 𝐺 equals the range of a function 𝐹, then the composition (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) is surjective iff 𝐺 and 𝐹 as function to the domain of 𝐺 are both surjective. Symmetric version of fnfocofob 44458 including the fact that 𝐹 is a surjection onto its range. (Contributed by GL and AV, 20-Sep-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 29-Sep-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐶) → ((𝐺 ∘ 𝐹):𝐴–onto→𝐷 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐶–onto→𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | f1ocof1ob 44460 | If the range of 𝐹 equals the domain of 𝐺, then the composition (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) is bijective iff 𝐹 and 𝐺 are both bijective. (Contributed by GL and AV, 7-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐶) → ((𝐺 ∘ 𝐹):𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐷 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | f1ocof1ob2 44461 | If the range of 𝐹 equals the domain of 𝐺, then the composition (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) is bijective iff 𝐹 and 𝐺 are both bijective. Symmetric version of f1ocof1ob 44460 including the fact that 𝐹 is a surjection onto its range. (Contributed by GL and AV, 20-Sep-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 7-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐶⟶𝐷 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐶) → ((𝐺 ∘ 𝐹):𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐷 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐷))) | ||
Syntax | caiota 44462 | Extend class notation with an alternative for Russell's definition of a description binder (inverted iota). |
class (℩'𝑥𝜑) | ||
Theorem | aiotajust 44463* | Soundness justification theorem for df-aiota 44464. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ ∩ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∩ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}} | ||
Definition | df-aiota 44464* |
Alternate version of Russell's definition of a description binder, which
can be read as "the unique 𝑥 such that 𝜑", where 𝜑
ordinarily contains 𝑥 as a free variable. Our definition
is
meaningful only when there is exactly one 𝑥 such that 𝜑 is true
(see aiotaval 44474); otherwise, it is not a set (see aiotaexb 44468), or even
more concrete, it is the universe V (see aiotavb 44469). Since this
is an alternative for df-iota 6376, we call this symbol ℩'
alternate iota in the following.
The advantage of this definition is the clear distinguishability of the defined and undefined cases: the alternate iota over a wff is defined iff it is a set (see aiotaexb 44468). With the original definition, there is no corresponding theorem (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) ≠ ∅), because ∅ can be a valid unique set satisfying a wff (see, for example, iota0def 44419). Only the right to left implication would hold, see (negated) iotanul 6396. For defined cases, however, both definitions df-iota 6376 and df-aiota 44464 are equivalent, see reuaiotaiota 44467. (Proposed by BJ, 13-Aug-2022.) (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} | ||
Theorem | dfaiota2 44465* | Alternate definition of the alternate version of Russell's definition of a description binder. Definition 8.18 in [Quine] p. 56. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)} | ||
Theorem | reuabaiotaiota 44466* | The iota and the alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 are equal iff there is a unique satisfying value of {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | reuaiotaiota 44467 | The iota and the alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 are equal iff there is a unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | aiotaexb 44468 | The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is a set iff there is a unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | aiotavb 44469 | The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is the universe iff there is no unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = V) | ||
Theorem | aiotaint 44470 | This is to df-aiota 44464 what iotauni 6393 is to df-iota 6376 (it uses intersection like df-aiota 44464, similar to iotauni 6393 using union like df-iota 6376; we could also prove an analogous result using union here too, in the same way that we have iotaint 6394). (Contributed by BJ, 31-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩'𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
Theorem | dfaiota3 44471 | Alternate definition of ℩': this is to df-aiota 44464 what dfiota4 6410 is to df-iota 6376. operation using the if operator. It is simpler than df-aiota 44464 and uses no dummy variables, so it would be the preferred definition if ℩' becomes the description binder used in set.mm. (Contributed by BJ, 31-Aug-2024.) |
⊢ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = if(∃!𝑥𝜑, ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}, V) | ||
Theorem | iotan0aiotaex 44472 | If the iota over a wff 𝜑 is not empty, the alternate iota over 𝜑 is a set. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ ((℩𝑥𝜑) ≠ ∅ → (℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | aiotaexaiotaiota 44473 | The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is a set iff the iota and the alternate iota over 𝜑 are equal. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ ((℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | aiotaval 44474* | Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of (alternate) iota. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩'𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | aiota0def 44475* | Example for a defined alternate iota being the empty set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 is a wff satisfied by a unique value 𝑥, namely 𝑥 = ∅ (the empty set is the one and only set which is a subset of every set). This corresponds to iota0def 44419. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (℩'𝑥∀𝑦 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | aiota0ndef 44476* | Example for an undefined alternate iota being no set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 is a wff not satisfied by a (unique) value 𝑥 (there is no set, and therefore certainly no unique set, which contains every set). This is different from iota0ndef 44420, where the iota still is a set (the empty set). (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (℩'𝑥∀𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ∉ V | ||
Theorem | r19.32 44477 | Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers, analogous to r19.32v 3267. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | rexsb 44478* | An equivalent expression for restricted existence, analogous to exsb 2357. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | rexrsb 44479* | An equivalent expression for restricted existence, analogous to exsb 2357. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | 2rexsb 44480* | An equivalent expression for double restricted existence, analogous to rexsb 44478. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | 2rexrsb 44481* | An equivalent expression for double restricted existence, analogous to 2exsb 2358. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | cbvral2 44482* | Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution, analogous to cbvral2v 3388. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜒 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | cbvrex2 44483* | Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution, analogous to cbvrex2v 3389. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜒 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | ralndv1 44484 | Example for a theorem about a restricted universal quantification in which the restricting class depends on (actually is) the bound variable: All sets containing themselves contain the universal class. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 V ∈ 𝑥 | ||
Theorem | ralndv2 44485 | Second example for a theorem about a restricted universal quantification in which the restricting class depends on the bound variable: all subsets of a set are sets. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥𝑥 ∈ V | ||
Theorem | reuf1odnf 44486* | There is exactly one element in each of two isomorphic sets. Variant of reuf1od 44487 with no distinct variable condition for 𝜒. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | reuf1od 44487* | There is exactly one element in each of two isomorphic sets. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | euoreqb 44488* | There is a set which is equal to one of two other sets iff the other sets are equal. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | 2reu3 44489* | Double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu3 2655. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | 2reu7 44490* | Two equivalent expressions for double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu7 2659. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | 2reu8 44491* | Two equivalent expressions for double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu8 2660. Curiously, we can put ∃! on either of the internal conjuncts but not both. We can also commute ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 using 2reu7 44490. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | 2reu8i 44492* | Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification, see also 2reu8 44491. The involved wffs depend on the setvar variables as follows: ph(x,y), ta(v,y), ch(x,w), th(v,w), et(x,b), ps(a,b), ze(a,w). (Contributed by AV, 1-Apr-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑏 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑎 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜁)) & ⊢ (((𝜒 → 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝑦 = 𝑤) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑏) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜂 → (𝑏 = 𝑦 ∧ (𝜓 → 𝑎 = 𝑥))))) | ||
Theorem | 2reuimp0 44493* | Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification. The involved wffs depend on the setvar variables as follows: ph(a,b), th(a,c), ch(d,b), ta(d,c), et(a,e), ps(a,f) (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝜂 ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜏 → 𝑏 = 𝑐)) → 𝑎 = 𝑑)) ∧ (𝜓 → 𝑒 = 𝑓))) | ||
Theorem | 2reuimp 44494* | Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification if the class of the quantified elements is not empty. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 𝜑) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜏 → 𝑏 = 𝑐)) → (𝜓 → (𝜂 ∧ (𝑎 = 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 = 𝑓))))) | ||
The current definition of the value (𝐹‘𝐴) of a function 𝐹 at an argument 𝐴 (see df-fv 6426) assures that this value is always a set, see fex 7084. This is because this definition can be applied to any classes 𝐹 and 𝐴, and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful (as shown by ndmfv 6786 and fvprc 6748). Although it is very convenient for many theorems on functions and their proofs, there are some cases in which from (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ alone it cannot be decided/derived whether (𝐹‘𝐴) is meaningful (𝐹 is actually a function which is defined for 𝐴 and really has the function value ∅ at 𝐴) or not. Therefore, additional assumptions are required, such as ∅ ∉ ran 𝐹, ∅ ∈ ran 𝐹 or Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 (see, for example, ndmfvrcl 6787). To avoid such an ambiguity, an alternative definition (𝐹'''𝐴) (see df-afv 44499) would be possible which evaluates to the universal class ((𝐹'''𝐴) = V) if it is not meaningful (see afvnfundmuv 44518, ndmafv 44519, afvprc 44523 and nfunsnafv 44521), and which corresponds to the current definition ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐴)) if it is (see afvfundmfveq 44517). That means (𝐹'''𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see afvpcfv0 44525), but (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V is not generally valid. In the theory of partial functions, it is a common case that 𝐹 is not defined at 𝐴, which also would result in (𝐹'''𝐴) = V. In this context we say (𝐹'''𝐴) "is not defined" instead of "is not meaningful". With this definition the following intuitive equivalence holds: (𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ V <-> "(𝐹'''𝐴) is meaningful/defined". An interesting question would be if (𝐹‘𝐴) could be replaced by (𝐹'''𝐴) in most of the theorems based on function values. If we look at the (currently 19) proofs using the definition df-fv 6426 of (𝐹‘𝐴), we see that analogues for the following 8 theorems can be proven using the alternative definition: fveq1 6755-> afveq1 44513, fveq2 6756-> afveq2 44514, nffv 6766-> nfafv 44515, csbfv12 6799-> csbafv12g , fvres 6775-> afvres 44551, rlimdm 15188-> rlimdmafv 44556, tz6.12-1 6778-> tz6.12-1-afv 44553, fveu 6746-> afveu 44532. Three theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6426 are within a mathbox (fvsb 41959) or not used (isumclim3 15399, avril1 28728). However, the remaining 8 theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6426 are used more or less often: * fvex 6769: used in about 1750 proofs. * tz6.12-1 6778: root theorem of many theorems which have not a strict analogue, and which are used many times: fvprc 6748 (used in about 127 proofs), tz6.12i 6782 (used - indirectly via fvbr0 6783 and fvrn0 6784- in 18 proofs, and in fvclss 7097 used in fvclex 7775 used in fvresex 7776, which is not used!), dcomex 10134 (used in 4 proofs), ndmfv 6786 (used in 86 proofs) and nfunsn 6793 (used by dffv2 6845 which is not used). * fv2 6751: only used by elfv 6754, which is only used by fv3 6774, which is not used. * dffv3 6752: used by dffv4 6753 (the previous "df-fv"), which now is only used in deprecated (usage discouraged) theorems or within mathboxes (csbfv12gALTVD 42408), by shftval 14713 (itself used in 9 proofs), by dffv5 34153 (mathbox) and by fvco2 6847, which has the analogue afvco2 44555. * fvopab5 6889: used only by ajval 29124 (not used) and by adjval 30153 (used - indirectly - in 9 proofs). * zsum 15358: used (via isum 15359, sum0 15361 and fsumsers 15368) in more than 90 proofs. * isumshft 15479: used in pserdv2 25494 and (via logtayl 25720) 4 other proofs. * ovtpos 8028: used in 14 proofs. As a result of this analysis we can say that the current definition of a function value is crucial for Metamath and cannot be exchanged easily with an alternative definition. While fv2 6751, dffv3 6752, fvopab5 6889, zsum 15358, isumshft 15479 and ovtpos 8028 are not critical or are, hopefully, also valid for the alternative definition, fvex 6769 and tz6.12-1 6778 (and the theorems based on them) are essential for the current definition of function values. With the same arguments, an alternative definition of operation values ((𝐴𝑂𝐵)) could be meaningful to avoid ambiguities, see df-aov 44500. For additional details, see https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4 44500. | ||
Syntax | wdfat 44495 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the "defined at" predicate. Read: "(the function) 𝐹 is defined at (the argument) 𝐴". In a previous version, the token "def@" was used. However, since the @ is used (informally) as a replacement for $ in commented out sections that may be deleted some day. While there is no violation of any standard to use the @ in a token, it could make the search for such commented-out sections slightly more difficult. (See remark of Norman Megill at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4). |
wff 𝐹 defAt 𝐴 | ||
Syntax | cafv 44496 | Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. Read: "the value of 𝐹 at 𝐴 " or "𝐹 of 𝐴". In a previous version, the symbol " ' " was used. However, since the similarity with the symbol ‘ used for the current definition of a function's value (see df-fv 6426), which, by the way, was intended to visualize that in many cases ‘ and " ' " are exchangeable, makes reading the theorems, especially those which use both definitions as dfafv2 44511, very difficult, 3 apostrophes ''' are used now so that it's easier to distinguish from df-fv 6426 and df-ima 5593. And not three backticks ( three times ‘) since that would be annoying to escape in a comment. (See remark of Norman Megill and Gerard Lang at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4 5593). |
class (𝐹'''𝐴) | ||
Syntax | caov 44497 | Extend class notation to include the value of an operation 𝐹 (such as +) for two arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵. Note that the syntax is simply three class symbols in a row surrounded by a pair of parentheses in contrast to the current definition, see df-ov 7258. |
class ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) | ||
Definition | df-dfat 44498 | Definition of the predicate that determines if some class 𝐹 is defined as function for an argument 𝐴 or, in other words, if the function value for some class 𝐹 for an argument 𝐴 is defined. We say that 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴 if a 𝐹 is a function restricted to the member 𝐴 of its domain. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}))) | ||
Definition | df-afv 44499* | Alternative definition of the value of a function, (𝐹'''𝐴), also known as function application. In contrast to (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see df-fv 6426 and ndmfv 6786), (𝐹'''𝐴) = V if F is not defined for A! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.) (Revised by BJ/AV, 25-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = (℩'𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥) | ||
Definition | df-aov 44500 | Define the value of an operation. In contrast to df-ov 7258, the alternative definition for a function value (see df-afv 44499) is used. By this, the value of the operation applied to two arguments is the universal class if the operation is not defined for these two arguments. There are still no restrictions of any kind on what those class expressions may be, although only certain kinds of class expressions - a binary operation 𝐹 and its arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵- will be useful for proving meaningful theorems. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐹'''〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |