Theorem 3impexpbicomiVD 40009

Description: Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicomi 39622. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

h1::	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
qed:1,?: e0a 39923	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3impexpbicomiVD.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3impexpbicomiVD	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

Proof of Theorem 3impexpbicomiVD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3impexpbicomiVD.1	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
2		3impexpbicom 39621	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))
3	2	biimpi 208	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))
4	1, 3	e0a 39923	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   ∧ w3a 1071

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-3an 1073

This theorem is referenced by: (None)