Theorem 3impexpbicomiVD 41564

Description: Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicomi 41186. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

h1::	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
qed:1,?: e0a 41478	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3impexpbicomiVD.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3impexpbicomiVD	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

Proof of Theorem 3impexpbicomiVD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3impexpbicomiVD.1	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
2		3impexpbicom 41185	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))
3	2	biimpi 219	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))
4	1, 3	e0a 41478	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1084

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-3an 1086

This theorem is referenced by: (None)