Axiom ax-ac2 10545

Description: In order to avoid uses of ax-reg 9590 for derivation of AC equivalents, we provide ax-ac2 10545, which is equivalent to the standard AC of textbooks. This appears to be the shortest known equivalent to the standard AC when expressed in terms of set theory primitives. It was found by Kurt Maes as Theorem ackm 10547. We removed the leading quantifier to make it slightly shorter, since we have ax-gen 1827 available. The derivation of ax-ac2 10545 from ax-ac 10541 is shown by Theorem axac2 10548, and the reverse derivation by axac 10549. Note that we use ax-reg 9590 to derive ax-ac 10541 from ax-ac2 10545, but not to derive ax-ac2 10545 from ax-ac 10541. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax-ac2	⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧∃𝑣∀𝑢((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣))) ∨ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)))))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑣,𝑢

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-ac2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vy	. . . . . . . 8 setvar 𝑦
2		vx	. . . . . . . 8 setvar 𝑥
3	1, 2	wel 2145	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
4		vz	. . . . . . . . 9 setvar 𝑧
5	4, 1	wel 2145	. . . . . . . 8 wff 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
6		vv	. . . . . . . . . . 11 setvar 𝑣
7	6, 2	wel 2145	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥
8	1, 6	weq 1994	. . . . . . . . . . 11 wff 𝑦 = 𝑣
9	8	wn 3	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑣
10	7, 9	wa 401	. . . . . . . . 9 wff (𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
11	4, 6	wel 2145	. . . . . . . . 9 wff 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣
12	10, 11	wa 401	. . . . . . . 8 wff ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣)
13	5, 12	wi 4	. . . . . . 7 wff (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣))
14	3, 13	wa 401	. . . . . 6 wff (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣)))
15	3	wn 3	. . . . . . 7 wff ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
16	4, 2	wel 2145	. . . . . . . 8 wff 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥
17	6, 4	wel 2145	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff 𝑣 ∈ 𝑧
18	6, 1	wel 2145	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦
19	17, 18	wa 401	. . . . . . . . 9 wff (𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦)
20		vu	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 setvar 𝑢
21	20, 4	wel 2145	. . . . . . . . . . 11 wff 𝑢 ∈ 𝑧
22	20, 1	wel 2145	. . . . . . . . . . 11 wff 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦
23	21, 22	wa 401	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff (𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦)
24	20, 6	weq 1994	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff 𝑢 = 𝑣
25	23, 24	wi 4	. . . . . . . . 9 wff ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)
26	19, 25	wa 401	. . . . . . . 8 wff ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
27	16, 26	wi 4	. . . . . . 7 wff (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
28	15, 27	wa 401	. . . . . 6 wff (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))))
29	14, 28	wo 861	. . . . 5 wff ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣))) ∨ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)))))
30	29, 20	wal 1567	. . . 4 wff ∀𝑢((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣))) ∨ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)))))
31	30, 6	wex 1811	. . 3 wff ∃𝑣∀𝑢((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣))) ∨ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)))))
32	31, 4	wal 1567	. 2 wff ∀𝑧∃𝑣∀𝑢((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣))) ∨ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)))))
33	32, 1	wex 1811	1 wff ∃𝑦∀𝑧∃𝑣∀𝑢((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣))) ∨ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)))))

This axiom is used by:  axac3  10546